This explains so much

[Herr Abubu]

[Harkonnen]

That is because high-T masculine men do not actively seek quarrels, especially with women who are not a threat to their status. Small digit men however act very aggressive when they're position is attacked by some low-T faggot fex.

Low-T men are basically bitches so is no surprise they bitch with the bitches (it's the estrogen fumes)

[cosmoo]

I don't believe in this "digit ratio" thingy...
Anyways, Negros have lowest digit ratio, while Neanderthals had almost exclusively longer index finger. So in light of present evidence: low ratio = Neanderthal DNA deficiency.

[Harkonnen]

I don't believe in this "digit ratio" thingy...
Anyways, Negros have lowest digit ratio, while Neanderthals had almost exclusively longer index finger. So in light of present evidence: low ratio = Neanderthal DNA deficiency.

Negros have also biggy dingdongs: this correlation obviously proves that digit ratio is the Real McCoy.

[cosmoo]

Negros have also biggy dingdongs: this correlation obviously proves that digit ratio is the Real McCoy.

If this "digit ratio" theory is indeed true, then low digit ratio is also pretty much correlated with low cranial capacity and a plethora of other not so positive traits.

[Herr Abubu]

I don't believe in this "digit ratio" thingy...
Anyways, Negros have lowest digit ratio, while Neanderthals had almost exclusively longer index finger. So in light of present evidence: low ratio = Neanderthal DNA deficiency.

Do they? From what I read, Chinese, blacks and Balkaners seem to have the lowest digit ratios.

[Harkonnen]

If this "digit ratio" theory is indeed true, then low digit ratio is also pretty much correlated with low cranial capacity and a plethora of other not so positive traits.

Correlation is not always causation.

In the biggydingdong it obviously is. In low cranial capacity likely not.

[cosmoo]

Do they? From what I read, Chinese, blacks and Balkaners seem to have the lowest digit ratios.

Nope. From what I've read East Asians have highest ratio, and many Balkaners also do (Bulgarians have highest in Europe IIRC, data on other Balkan countries was scarce). Negros have consistently low ratio.
Percentage of Neanderthal DNA is most likely strongly correlated with high digit ratio.

Correlation is not always causation.

In the biggydingdong it obviously is. In low cranial capacity likely not.

Read what I wrote above. It is pretty much obvious that peoples with higher cranial capacity and bodymass (East Asians, most of Europeans) have higher ratio than those with low ones (Negros).

[Herr Abubu]

Nope. From what I've read East Asians have highest ratio, and many Balkaners also do (Bulgarians have highest in Europe IIRC, data on other Balkan countries was scarce). Negros have consistently low ratio.
Percentage of Neanderthal DNA is most likely strongly correlated with high digit ratio.

Asians except for the Chinese have high ratios. Maybe it's only Chinese among East Asians, or maybe Asian refers to other Asians, not East Asians.

"It should be noted, however, that the standard deviations associated with each given 2D:4D mean are considerable. For example, the ratio for Han children (0.954±−0.032) allows for a ratio as low as 0.922, while the ratio for Jamaican children (0.935±0.035) allows for a ratio as high as 0.970. Thus some ethnic group's confidence interval overlaps. A 2008 study by Lu et al. found that the mean values of 2D:4D of the Hui and the Han in Ningxia were lower than those in European countries like Britain.[46] In 2007 Manning et al. also found that mean 2D:4D varied across ethnic groups with higher ratios for Whites, Non-Chinese Asians, and Mid-Easterners and lower ratios in Chinese and Black samples.[47]"

From the Europeans tested, Greeks have the lowest digit ratio. 0.92, iirc, which is a very low average. I haven't seen Albanians studied, but I'd assume we have very low, too. It is environmental to a great extent, by the way. Foods, household products, etc., affect the levels of testosterone in the womb.

Either way, a high digit ratio in a man implies subhumanity. Negroes, who don't really have higher DR, would be superior to Eurocucks and East Asian cucks. They are superior to the Danes, though, who have an 1.02 average. The Danes should be genocided.

[cosmoo]

Either way, a high digit ratio in a man implies subhumanity. Negroes, who don't really have higher DR, would be superior to Eurocucks and East Asian cucks. They are superior to the Danes, though, who have an 1.02 average. The Danes should be genocided.

Nope, a low digit ratio (IF the theory is true) implies microcephaly (via lack of Neanderthal DNA) and faggotry (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11053694, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12573297, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15694118).

BTW there have been studies claiming Neanderthals also had low digit ratio, but they erroneously used hand of Qafzeh 9 (modern hominid).

Modern human hand on left, Neanderthal on right (note that last fingerbone on index finger is missing):