National Socialist Germany vs ''Democratic'' Germany

[The.Mask]

Video based on facts.

Which do you prefer?

[StormBringer]

Did you know that Berlin was the gay capital of world in 1920's?

I have a feeling this is like the pit and the pendulum, and once it starts swinging back, Europe will have its guts torn asunder.

[The.Mask]

Did you know that Berlin was the gay capital of world in 1920's?

I have a feeling this is like the pit and the pendulum, and once it starts swinging back, Europe will have its guts torn asunder.

Yes, it was a gay capital and a capital of pre porno also.

That all changed in 1933.

[Herr Abubu]

There were positive aspects to the Hitlerians, but they are not the answer, very far from it. Hitler was an antichrist, very much a Nietzschean and a Darwinist. Very little about Hitler was different from the liberalism of his time. He was quite popular within exactly Western intellectual circles for that reason. This is the man who encouraged German women to have sex on top of the graves of dead German war heroes so that these women would give birth to brave children. Not very traditional.

Do you know that obscure American intelligence reports linked Hitler to the Rothschilds? Makes sense, doesn't it, when you know that Hitler never did anything to actually hurt the Financier class, but was actually heavily financed by it. Members of the Warburg banking family, very well known to be underlings of the Rothschilds, were helped out of Europe by the Nazis. There were cases where the Gestapo had Rothschild family members in their claws, but simply let them go.

Who benefited from WW2? Everyone but the Germans, again. It cemented American world power, specifically.

You have to look further to the East for answers, for something truly essentially anti-modern. The Nazis were in reality a Bourgeois movement. What traditionalism existed existed only for its function, its utility. It's bourgeois utilitarianism rooted exactly in the modernist heresy.

[The.Mask]

There were positive aspects to the Hitlerians, but they are not the answer, very far from it. Hitler was an antichrist, very much a Nietzschean and a Darwinist. Very little about Hitler was different from the liberalism of his time. He was quite popular within exactly Western intellectual circles for that reason. This is the man who encouraged German women to have sex on top of the graves of dead German war heroes so that these women would give birth to brave children. Not very traditional.

Do you know that obscure American intelligence reports linked Hitler to the Rothschilds? Makes sense, doesn't it, when you know that Hitler never did anything to actually hurt the Financier class, but was actually heavily financed by it. Members of the Warburg banking family, very well known to be underlings of the Rothschilds, were helped out of Europe by the Nazis. There were cases where the Gestapo had Rothschild family members in their claws, but simply let them go.

Who benefited from WW2? Everyone but the Germans, again. It cemented American world power, specifically.

You have to look further to the East for answers, for something truly essentially anti-modern. The Nazis were in reality a Bourgeois movement. What traditionalism existed existed only for its function, its utility. It's bourgeois utilitarianism rooted exactly in the modernist heresy.

I am not saying that the 3rd Reich was the answer to everything, but a normal person can not denny that it was the peak of the civilization in terms of state and army efficiency, being also unmatched in engineering and science production.

Nietzsche used to be a believer and despite he started to not believe anymore, we can not deny he was a great mind. We can not deny a man because he starts to not believe anymore.

Hitler never attacked the Church ( like stalin did ) and he always mentioned God and Christianity in his speeches. an anti Christ does not do that. He mentiones Christianity as a bacbone of the morality of the nation

Start watching at 4:40



I never knew he encouraged german women to have sex at top of the graves of german war heroes.... he encouraged eugenics and he did well. You know every well how necessary eugenics are.

It has been debunked a long time ago that Hitler was linked to Rothschilds. He attacked the Rothschilds insitutions and banks when he took over Austria in 1938 and made the bank of Frankfurt, which was the center of Rothschilds power a property of the state.

He also released Reichmarks, currency free of debt.




3rd Reich went against the world order with the state he created and that the establishment made the imposible to bring the Reich into the war.

Pax Americana was already established a long time ago since 1919 and even before that with the Brits, the true pawns of the establishment.

[Herr Abubu]

Nietzsche is a very insightful thinker for many reasons, but there is a difference between appreciating many of his insights and becoming a Nietzschean. When Nietzsche becomes a prescriptive, everything goes very, very awry.

Eugenics is thoroughly evil. It is something very modern, very bourgeois. As was Hitler, through and through. To approve of eugenics one has to accept modernity fundamentally. Nothing can ever move forward towards Good, then.

Hitler was somehow anti-establishment, and yet loved by the elites of Britain and America and financed by the New York Financiers, who also financed the Bolsheviks. What's up with the Nazis' niceties towards the Warburgs? What's up with their niceties towards the Rothschilds?

Hitler would of course use pro-Christian rhetoric in a country with a lot of Christians. He was a rhetorician, after all. What's important is what he said about Christianity privately and his actions.

[Norb]

There were positive aspects to the Hitlerians, but they are not the answer, very far from it. Hitler was an antichrist, very much a Nietzschean and a Darwinist. Very little about Hitler was different from the liberalism of his time. He was quite popular within exactly Western intellectual circles for that reason. This is the man who encouraged German women to have sex on top of the graves of dead German war heroes so that these women would give birth to brave children. Not very traditional.

Do you know that obscure American intelligence reports linked Hitler to the Rothschilds? Makes sense, doesn't it, when you know that Hitler never did anything to actually hurt the Financier class, but was actually heavily financed by it. Members of the Warburg banking family, very well known to be underlings of the Rothschilds, were helped out of Europe by the Nazis. There were cases where the Gestapo had Rothschild family members in their claws, but simply let them go.

Who benefited from WW2? Everyone but the Germans, again. It cemented American world power, specifically.

You have to look further to the East for answers, for something truly essentially anti-modern. The Nazis were in reality a Bourgeois movement. What traditionalism existed existed only for its function, its utility. It's bourgeois utilitarianism rooted exactly in the modernist heresy.

DEBUNKED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hE0gu5cjwCo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oe10XTea2k

[Norb]

Did you know that Berlin was the gay capital of world in 1920's?

I have a feeling this is like the pit and the pendulum, and once it starts swinging back, Europe will have its guts torn asunder.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxVGNk2Ma-8

[Lionel]

Nietzsche is a very insightful thinker for many reasons, but there is a difference between appreciating many of his insights and becoming a Nietzschean. When Nietzsche becomes a prescriptive, everything goes very, very awry.

Eugenics is thoroughly evil. It is something very modern, very bourgeois. As was Hitler, through and through. To approve of eugenics one has to accept modernity fundamentally. Nothing can ever move forward towards Good, then.

Hitler was somehow anti-establishment, and yet loved by the elites of Britain and America and financed by the New York Financiers, who also financed the Bolsheviks. What's up with the Nazis' niceties towards the Warburgs? What's up with their niceties towards the Rothschilds?

Hitler would of course use pro-Christian rhetoric in a country with a lot of Christians. He was a rhetorician, after all. What's important is what he said about Christianity privately and his actions.

Has anyone ever told you that your logic is retarded and backwards (not calling you that)? There's literally nothing wrong with eugenics.

[JohnSmith]

Who the hell would prefer a dictatorship with a madman in charge. The Nazi did not even last 20 years in power. The current Germany is doing great and a leader economically of Europe.

The EU is a rehash of the German Holy Roman Empire. The Germans ultimately control the EU through their economic might to influence the ECB.