Is Costa Rica really white?

[Costas]

Rainbowmimi as source? Nothing against her, but Ok, HAHAHAHA. Listen, I'm just answering a question of an euro member. Don't come bitching on me nor start the cholo flame war. I don't have patient to discuss about which latin american country is less mongrel in average anymore. If you dislike my post just thumbs down or report it. Don't need quote me.

Thanks in advance. Cheers;
Tobi.

You don't have a patient?

What are you a doctor

[Costas]

I'm from Costa Rica. Less than 1% of the population are full white people and like 8-10% (this is hard to define) are in the 70-90% of european genetic. The rest are mestizos, trirracials and harnizos. But i would say 35 % of the population can pass in southern europe no matter if they are mestizos because their "pale" phenotype. For example me, i'm in the harnizo rank but i think i could pass in Spain.

Similar to Chile then.

No, it is like Chile albeit with a small Black minority - mostly Mestizo but with a notable White minority. All the same, the mass migration from Nicaragua in particular has made CR more Mestizo still.

This.

[XenophobicPrussian]

the mass migration from Nicaragua in particular has made CR more Mestizo still.

Hahahahahahahahahahaha.

Fucking naive traitors exist everywhere. Chile/Argentina are also letting in a lot of Peruvians/Bolivians.

I bet there's humans going into fucking withdrawals if they aren't virtue signalling or helping "their fellow man" out even in the slightest most useless non-large impact making ways.

I just don't understand.

[XenophobicPrussian]

Why do you say it's 64% European? I've saw a study where both countries where included and Chile appeared as more Euro than Costa Rica?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12556237

The proportions of genes of European, Amerindian and African ancestry were found to be 61%, 30% and 9% of the total population, respectively.

That's what I was referring to. Remembered wrong, 61%, but still higher than Chile(which is in the 50s I believe) and in fourth place for Latin America. I believe Chileans have the least African in Latin America though(or Uruguay). Cuba has a lot of European but little Amerindian and a lot of African.

[Tobi]

You don't have a patient?

What are you a doctor

Hmm, great point as usual. Probably a better argument than "my friends are still whites" thought.

[Costas]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12556237

That's what I was referring to. Remembered wrong, 61%, but still higher than Chile(which is in the 50s I believe) and in fourth place for Latin America. I believe Chileans have the least African in Latin America though(or Uruguay). Cuba has a lot of European but little Amerindian and a lot of African.

Oh I thought you meant 64% European as in 64% White.

There's another study that puts Costa Rica at 46% European though, and another one at around 55% IIRC.

---

Yep Chile is around 55% IMO. Santiago (where I'm from) is around 60% Euro though.

---

And yeah Chile is probably the country with the lowest African in Latin America.

Uruguay has a Mulatto minority in Montevideo I think.

Hmm, great point as usual. Probably a better argument than "my friends are still whites" thought.

I think you mean "though", not "thought"

Better stick to the Portuguese little Tobi

[TheForeigner]

Depends what is white to you

If white to you is +90% euro then around 25-30% of Brazil and Argentina
If white to you is +80% euro then around 40-50% of Brazil and Argentina
If white to you is +70% euro then around 50-70% of Brazil and Argentina

For example messi is probably around 80-90% euro and i doubt most people would see him as non white

What about Uruguay?

[TheForeigner]

I guess Uruguay is like Argentina.

[Argentano]

I guess Uruguay is like Argentina.

What about Uruguay?

IMO Uruguay is similar to Argentine Pampa.

http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?...32016000100001

In the admixture analysis, the European contribution was 82% in MM patients and 77% in controls. No Native American contribution was detected in MM patients and only a 3% contribution was found in controls (Table 3).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4341228/

We confirmed the tri-hybrid nature of the Uruguayan population, which showed contributions from Africans, Native Americans and Europeans. We found that the Structure model assuming a three-way admixture process provided the best fit, compared to models considering either one or two parental populations (data not shown). Ancestral proportions in the population as a whole were (mean ± SD) 9.4 ± 7.5%, 14.0 ± 10.8% and 76.6 ± 13.7%, respectively. There was considerable variation in ancestry among participants. Nuclear DNA African ancestry ranged from 1% to 43%, Native American ancestry from 1% to 48%, and European ancestry from 33% to 96% (Figure 1).

[Heather Duval]

Nope, I said it because you said "any person with light skin is considered white" in those countries (Costa Rica and Chile).

That's true for Brazil as well. Even Rainbowmimi said it a few posts ago.

Also don't "m8" me, and don't say "mongrel" that word is really racist.

True, in my high school many pardos considered themselves white, they look like selena gomez, david silva, most of them