0
I do know that the Germans originally invited the Turks. Even Angela Merkel said we believed they will go home, but they are here to stay.
These non-Whites such as North Africans and South Asians and to lesser extent Africans are a result of the European empires and there descendants now are citizens of the respective colonial nations. The time might be gone, but certainly not it's legacy.Originally Posted by Rumata
I was referring to Britain and France, as well other Western nations who did. Sure Sweden did not have the colonies, however it choose to put itself through this situation, because it wants to appear as the humanitarian powerOriginally Posted by Rumata
Well there many other factors.Originally Posted by Rumata
Of course they will be disliked, because there is large wave of migrants, and I would not call it an invasion. If you want to see what a real invasion looks like, then see the Iraq war of 2003. These people are just escaping the hell that was unleashed on them.Originally Posted by Rumata
If the war is over, I believe these people should go back to their nation and rebuild it. Well there are different types of refugees, but if the situation improves most people would like to go into their own land, because that's how it's naturally.Originally Posted by Rumata
It's not only due to benefits, because it's more complex, it's also Sweden trying to show itself as world power through humanitarianism. I believe ideally that NATO nations especially Britain and U.S are responsible for this situation, and this why they should be the ones taking responsibility for the refugees and the so called migrant crisis. However since many refugees from Syria and Iraq are in Sweden, Germany and so on, I believe they should stay there, until the war ends and their nations rebuild. I believe Britain and the U.S should get these refugees and even provide compensation.Originally Posted by Rumata
Bookmarks