3
Speaking to people from Slavic countries taught me that the British and American way of identifying ancestry is actually incorrect. Typically we like to say we are fully English, or half English and half German, or one quarter Russian and three quarters Scottish, etc. However, Slavs have told me that it is actually your paternal line that determines your ethnicity. Upon further research I have found this to be inherently true among most traditional cultures, both in Europe and Asia.
I accept this view of identity as a paternal inheritance.
However, what I do not understand is whether or not this idea of ancestry stops a person recognising their non-paternal lines of descent. For example, you can say that you are English because that is what your father is, but can you also recognise your German/Russian/Lithuanian, maternal ancestry as well? Or should you only recognise your paternal ethnicity? And also, is it the case that once a woman marries outside her nation, she adopts the ethnicity of her husband?
From a modern point of view, do we recognise non-paternal lines, for example, in genetic research?
Thank you for all your help in explaining to me the traditional ways.
Bookmarks