Indus Valley Civilization Y-DNA haplogroups

[Peterski]

They had Y-DNA haplogroups L-M20 and R2, no any R1 was found, as expected:

http://eurogenes.blogspot.fr/2017/02...ks-thread.html

[Milo]

[Dravidianness Intensifies]










I'm not sure about David's comments over there though

[Peterski]

I'm not sure about David's comments over there though

Check also their discussion below David's post. Chad Rohlfsen mentioned R2 (apart from L-M20).

[Milo]

Check also their discussion below David's post. Chad Rohlfsen mentioned R2 (apart from L-M20).

that is what i'm talking about. not about R2, but about their autosomal


and a lot of it just seems like baseless rumours.

[XenophobicPrussian]

LOL at the Hindi fuckers in every Eurogenes comment section still holding onto the wishful thinking that their R1a is local.

PIE homeland was solved in 2015 and has kept being reinforced. There's no more debate here. Their R2 y-dna isn't local either(it's older in the region but still not local), but an ANE/Amerindian haplogroup that killed off the local Basal Eurasian Iranian G1/E/J males.

[Lucas]

Nice destructon of Indian dreams

[Milo]

@Litvin I think you completely misunderstood me. I wasn't talking about R1a part. I know that PIE originating in India thing is baseless and logically impossible


I was talking about their expected autosomal results.

and see this

Over at Anthrogenica, there's now two members who say they've heard from people associated with the Rakhigarhi investigation that the Rakhigarhi aDNA samples were overwhelmingly L-M20.

02-03-2017, 07:35 AM #379
khanabadoshi
Posts 1,555
Sex ♂
Location USA
Ethnicity BalochKashmirUzbekKhowar
Nationality USA
Y-DNA R-Y17491 > R-YP4858
mtDNA A8a
Pakistan Azad Kashmir Afghanistan Iran India United States of America

So I don't know if this has been discussed, but I heard from somebody who knows an archeologist at the Rakhigarhi site.
They are going to release a paper later in the year and 80-90% of the samples were y-HG L-M20.

I will inquire for more details. I can't verify the authenticity of the man's claims.


The following was in response,

Yesterday, 02:54 AM #442
Generalissimo
Senior Member
Posts 1,637
Sex ♂

I've heard the same.


(Just remembered. Earlier at anthrogenica I had come across a discussion where Generalissimo was indicated to be Davidski. That would explain the subject of today's blog post here.)

Khanabadoshi's choice of expression has got me confused. Eurogenes had mentioned 12 ancient samples were genotyped from the Rakhigarhi site. Neither 80% nor 90% thereof produce very round figures, at 9.6 to 10.8 ancient persons. Does it imply the remaining 10-20% samples were female, so that all ancient males were L-M20. Or does it mean that oddly all of the samples are exclusively male, with the remaining 1-2 ancient people being some other Y haplogroup? (Since Chad Rohlfsen has said L and R2 above, though it's not clear if the R2 is meant predictively or based on a rumour or leak. Razib Khan had predicted H and L a couple of years back.)

[Ülev]

L-M27

L-M20

L1c-M357

L1b-M317(L2)

[Lucas]

^^ The red dots mean some local L places?
There are some western Balkan, Caucasus, Russia and Portugal concentrations...

[Ülev]

^^ The red dots mean some local L places?
There are some western Balkan, Caucasus, Russia and Portugal concentrations...

I just checked my firefox history, I copied it from this thread: http://s1.zetaboards.com/anthroscape/topic/5126247/15/