San Diego, San Fran, or LA, which Cali city do you prefer more....

[Cristiano viejo]

San Francisco has way more culture to offer than the other two.

You should note Sacramento, it's totally underrated but it's becoming the Portland of California. Really cool, hip, urban core filled with hipsters, and pretty rural in the outskirts. It's also a very outdoorsy city, very easy to escape the city and get to the great outdoors, just about 40 minutes away.

Gay culture, you mean...

[Philip Latinowitz]

San Diego. Chill place, beach, surfing....lot of Whites there. San Francisco has bad weather and I'm not interested in European-like town if would live in the US. LA is just another shitty Mexican ghetto (no offense).....

[Cristiano viejo]

What about San José, brothers?

[zhaoyun]

What about San José, brothers?

San Jose is barely a city. It has a large population but it's just a big suburb, the downtown is dead. It has a lot of money because of Silicon Valley but it is a soulless, boring, dead city.

Sacramento is way more interesting and vibrant of a city than San Jose.

Oakland has a lot more soul and character than San Jose, it is half filled with the ghetto and the other half are hipsters.

[Peter Nirsch]

American cities are extremely ugly, in that group the only decent place is San Francisco, because it resembles a little bit an European city.

[zhaoyun]

Gay culture, you mean...

There is that. But San Francisco is unique because it has many different neighborhoods with their own character in a small area. San Francisco is a much more intellectual city than LA. LA is pretty much just flashy cars and bimbos with plastic tits.

[zhaoyun]

American cities are extremely ugly, in that group the only decent place is San Francisco, because it resembles a little bit an European city.

American cities started to become ugly after the 50s, usually the old downtown areas that were built before that period are pretty attractive.

San Francisco is a beautiful city because a lot of it was built before the 50s, and it is located in a small peninsula surrounded by water and sits on many hills, which provides great scenic opportunities.

[Lightshade25]

San Diego. Chill place, beach, surfing....lot of Whites there. San Francisco has bad weather and I'm not interested in European-like town if would live in the US. LA is just another shitty Mexican ghetto (no offense).....

Rofl dead right about LA

[Oneeye]

I've only been to San Francisco of the three. I'm not even sure why I would want to visit San Diego or Las Angeles.

SF is nice to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there. Too many Berkeley types and homeless.

[Peter Nirsch]

American cities started to become ugly after the 50s, usually the old downtown areas that were built before that period are pretty attractive.

San Francisco is a beautiful city because a lot of it was built before the 50s, and it is located in a small peninsula surrounded by water and sits on many hills, which provides great scenic opportunities.

they have never been beautiful, they have no history, they have no art, they are boring! I hate their orthogonal grid, the style of their buildings, their repetitive suburbs.