The Battle of Keren, Where Indians Beat Fascist Italy of The Failed Italian Empire

[MagnusAurelius]

i hate those random white people who are obsessed with things like Vedic culture and stuff because they consider that to be a part of "white culture" and feel a relation to it

these are the same people who'd go around posting cherrypicked inbred pashtun beggers or tribal savages like kalashits

In a way you can say it is part of the greater "White Culture" due to the Kalash being genetically closer to Europeans than Indians of today, the Kalash are what the original Rigvedic Aryans looked like and they most likely looked similar to the pre-indoo european speaking Caucasoids of the Indus Valley Civilization.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalash_people#Religion

This form of ancient Hinduism practiced by the Kalash includes customs that were practiced by Rigvedic Aryans. Kalash have retained most of the Proto-Indo-Iranian religion (Indo-European religion). The Hindukush area shares many of the traits of Indo-Iranian myths, rituals, society, and echoes many aspects of Ṛigvedic, but hardly of post-Ṛigvedic religion.[19]

[Pahli]

In a way you can say it is part of the greater "White Culture" due to the Kalash being genetically closer to Europeans than Indians of today, the Kalash are what the original Rigvedic Aryans looked like and they most likely looked similar to the pre-indoo european speaking Caucasoids of the Indus Valley Civilization.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalash_people#Religion

This form of ancient Hinduism practiced by the Kalash includes customs that were practiced by Rigvedic Aryans. Kalash have retained most of the Proto-Indo-Iranian religion (Indo-European religion). The Hindukush area shares many of the traits of Indo-Iranian myths, rituals, society, and echoes many aspects of Ṛigvedic, but hardly of post-Ṛigvedic religion.[19]

Actually Jatts and Pamiri people in Tajikistan have the highest Aryan admixture, Kalash people are close though.

[Milo]

In a way you can say it is part of the greater "White Culture" due to the Kalash being genetically closer to Europeans than Indians of today, the Kalash are what the original Rigvedic Aryans looked like and they most likely looked similar to the pre-indoo european speaking Caucasoids of the Indus Valley Civilization.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalash_people#Religion

This form of ancient Hinduism practiced by the Kalash includes customs that were practiced by Rigvedic Aryans. Kalash have retained most of the Proto-Indo-Iranian religion (Indo-European religion). The Hindukush area shares many of the traits of Indo-Iranian myths, rituals, society, and echoes many aspects of Ṛigvedic, but hardly of post-Ṛigvedic religion.[19]

Utter nonsense. Kalashas cluster with other people of their region. "Indian" is not a collective group.

Besides, all this is irrelevant, as they have nothing to do with Europeans apart from some superficial similarities in appearance, due to excessive inbreeding and mutations.



You claiming Indian civilizations/culture is like me claiming Roman culture. It's preposterous.
Besides, the Indus valley Civilization was Dravidian, and not related to the kalash tribals in any way.

[MagnusAurelius]

Utter nonsense. Kalashas cluster with other people of their region. "Indian" is not a collective group.

Besides, all this is irrelevant, as they have nothing to do with Europeans apart from some superficial similarities in appearance, due to excessive inbreeding and mutations.



You claiming Indian civilizations/culture is like me claiming Roman culture. It's preposterous.
Besides, the Indus valley Civilization was Dravidian, and not related to the kalash tribals in any way.

The original Dravidians were a Mediterranean looking Caucasoid people, you can still see many of them in South India today as with high caste Tamils and this Malayli Christian Kerella girl I had intimate fun with a year ago. Many of them mixed with Indigenous Indians, they were not even refered to as Dravidians back then, the Dravidian designation comes from the British Empire occupation, modern Dravidians are the result of significant mixing between Indigenous Indians and the Non-Indo European speaking group of Caucasoids in India far before the Indo-Aryan migrations. The exception is high caste South Indians are only moderately mixed with Indigenous Indians and may be 70-75% Caucasoid if you go by ancestral genetics and in terms of facial features they may have fully Caucasoid faces.





Also wrong, the Kalash are genetically closer to Europeans, the original Caucaasoids of tthe Indus Valley are probably genetically closer to more Caucasoid Indians of today than they are Europeans but I think the original RigVedic tribes were closer to Europeans genetically since the Kalash are.

Figures in red are not accurate but they ones in blue are and the Kalash are still closer to Europeans than they are with ethnic groups like the Pashtuns and Sindhi's , 2 ethnic groups who have 70-75% ANI (Ancestral North Indian) admixture which is genetically close with Central Asians/MiddleEastern and Europeans.

I made a post on the Indus Valley Civilization here.

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...logroups/page2

[Purohit ji]

The original Dravidians were a Mediterranean looking Caucasoid people, you can still see many of them in South India today as with high caste Tamils and this Malayli Christian Kerella girl I had intimate fun with a year ago. Many of them mixed with Indigenous Indians, they were not even refered to as Dravidians back then, the Dravidian designation comes from the British Empire occupation, modern Dravidians are the result of significant mixing between Indigenous Indians and the Non-Indo European speaking group of Caucasoids in India far before the Indo-Aryan migrations. The exception is high caste South Indians are only moderately mixed with Indigenous Indians and may be 70-75% Caucasoid if you go by ancestral genetics and in terms of facial features they may have fully Caucasoid faces.





Also wrong, the Kalash are genetically closer to Europeans, the original Caucaasoids of tthe Indus Valley are probably genetically closer to more Caucasoid Indians of today than they are Europeans but I think the original RigVedic tribes were closer to Europeans genetically since the Kalash are.

Figures in red are not accurate but they ones in blue are and the Kalash are still closer to Europeans than they are with ethnic groups like the Pashtuns and Sindhi's , 2 ethnic groups who have 70-75% ANI (Ancestral North Indian) admixture which is genetically close with Central Asians/MiddleEastern and Europeans.

I made a post on the Indus Valley Civilization here.

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...logroups/page2

The kalash people are south Asians and are genetically closer to indians than any European in this world.

[MagnusAurelius]

The kalash people are south Asians and are genetically closer to indians than any European in this world.

You did not even examine the genetic distance map I posted, you are clearly wrong, the Kalash are closer to Europeans if you looked closely. You can't accept the truth that the original Rigvedic Aryans in their racial purity are closer to Europeans genetically, the most racially pure people in South Asia today are Pakistanis and North Indians along with some High Castte South Indians. The most racially pure ethnicities are Jatts, Kashmiri's, other Punjabis, Sindhi's and Pathans, all these groups have 70-80% Ancestral North Indian ancestry (which is ancestry genettically closer to Europeans,Central Asians and MiddleEastern people).

[Purohit ji]

You did not even examine the genetic distance map I posted, you are clearly wrong, the Kalash are closer to Europeans if you looked closely. You can't accept the truth that the original Rigvedic Aryans in their racial purity are closer to Europeans genetically, the most racially pure people in South Asia today are Pakistanis and North Indians along with some High Castte South Indians. The most racially pure ethnicities are Jatts, Kashmiri's, other Punjabis, Sindhi's and Pathans, all these groups have 70-80% Ancestral North Indian ancestry (which is ancestry genettically closer to Europeans,Central Asians and MiddleEastern people).

From harrapa results

Kalash people are 22% south indian
My people are 31% south indian
Other rajasthani brahmins are 32% south indians
European are less than 1% south indina
Now tell me who is closer to kalash me or you?

[Shah-Jehan]

There's kalash results in Harappa lmao, everybody knows what their genetic composition is.

[Wadaad]

The white ppl have Ross

and the Indian ppl have you...

[MagnusAurelius]

From harrapa results

Kalash people are 22% south indian
My people are 31% south indian
Other rajasthani brahmins are 32% south indians
European are less than 1% south indina
Now tell me who is closer to kalash me or you?

The non-south indian ancestry is closer to Europeans, the genetic distance map clearly shows they are slightly closer to Europeans than other south asian ethnic groups genetically closest to them, being the Sindhi and Pathans.

Going by some ancestry calculator is a pseudo-science, those calculators can be changed to include whatever ancestry they want forming 1 ancestral genetic cluster. Those calculators simply divide what regions some ancestry is from and puts it into 1 cluster, the only ones that make more sense is when you are dividing them between Caucasoid/Mongoloid etc, putting all the autosomal ancestry of a certain race into 1 cluster.