0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,036 Given: 1,056 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,997 Given: 6,001 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,042 Given: 1,392 |
Even Serbs on their project agree that was brought by Slavs on Balkan
Thumbs Up |
Received: 89 Given: 7 |
How about both.
I mean, there is absolutely zero proof of this "slavic migration" whatsoever.
this is because they lived with Slavs and slavicised their language before came to other places, Slavs use word ogień/ohen etc for fire, Croats say vatra and their national football team is called "vatreni" = flaming/fiery, and their vocabulary has common words with old-Avestan language
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,042 Given: 1,392 |
Are you crazy, every medieval document Greek and Roman describes Slavs coming on Balkan.
Yes I2a1 were not originally Slavs, we all know that. They were Slavicized behind Carpathian mountains by R1a carriers.
What we are saying here is they arrived as Slavs in Balkan, when Slavic migrations took place 6th and 7th century.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,036 Given: 1,056 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,042 Given: 1,392 |
Yes it was not originally Slavic as you can see that i agree with that on my previous post but i think there is no chance that I2a1b arrived as anything here but as a fully Slavic and Slavicized people.
Your theory of Slavicization on Balkan is really hard to swallow. We already discussed this i remember.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks