0
Most likely the DNA was contributed by Indian Gypsies who intermixed with Turkish people explaining why modern Gypsies Turkish look more like Turkish people than Indian
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneti...Turkish_people
" Autosomal studies with recent methodology estimate the Central Asian contribution in Turkish people at 13-15%[1][2][3] noting that results may indicate previous population movements (e.g. migration, admixture) or genetic drift, given the fact that Europe and South Asia have some genetic relatedness. "
" The largest autosomal study on Turkish genetics predicted that the weight of Central Asian migration legacy of the Turkish people is estimated at 21.7%.[4] The authors conclude on the basis of previous studies that "South Asian contribution to Turkey's population was significantly higher than East/Central Asian contributions, suggesting that the genetic variation of medieval Central Asian populations may be more closely related to South Asian populations, or that there was continued low level migration from South Asia into Anatolia." They note that these weights are not direct estimates of the migration rates as the original donor populations are not known, and the exact kinship between current East Asians and the medieval Oghuz Turks is uncertain. For instance, genetic pools of Central Asian Turkic peoples is particularly diverse and modern Oghuz Turkmens living in Central Asia are with slightly higher West Eurasian genetic component than East Eurasian.[5][6] "
Bookmarks