Why people assume that if gypsies get support from india they will be all deported somewhere there?

[RN97]

India will not care that's for sure. Gypsies are not unified entity and yes many Gypsies are mixed well those in Britain and Nordic nations, have a lot of European blood with only relic of their South Asian origins.

If you're referring to Irish travelers that's something else, they are fully white, but it's a myth created by nordicist undertones that northern European gypsies are somehow "whiter". Tell me how white these Norwegian gypsies are:

[StonyArabia]

If you're referring to Irish travelers that's something else, they are fully white, but it's a myth created by nordicist undertones that northern European gypsies are somehow "whiter". Tell me how white these Norwegian gypsies are:

Those are Finnish Kale, or possibly Romanian Gypsies. However the Romanichals have absorbed much amounts of British native blood. The Scandoroma did the same. This is less with the Finnish Kale and recent Balkan immigrants. Swedish Gypsies look White. These guys certainly don't look White.

[Shah-Jehan]

If you're referring to Irish travelers that's something else, they are fully white, but it's a myth created by nordicist undertones that northern European gypsies are somehow "whiter". Tell me how white these Norwegian gypsies are:

Yeah, phenotype-wise they have retained a lot of "brown skin" due to endogamy but still are more "western looking" than South Asians , the one thing conencting them is their brown skin, but genetically, even most Balkan ones are either 50% European, with ones further north, especially in the British Isles being more European.



Read this:

So there we have it. The Romani derive from lower castes populations from the northwest Indian subcontinent who seem to have left ~1,000 years ago. Over time they admixed with local populations, and are now 50-70% non-South Asian, with some groups being ~90% European (e.g., Welsh Romani). And, they have a long history as an endogamous group, judging by their inbreeding.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gn.../#.WM2wx_nyvIU

[RN97]

Those are Finnish Kale, or possibly Romanian Gypsies. However the Romanichals have absorbed much amounts of British native blood. The Scandoroma did the same. This is less with the Finnish Kale and recent Balkan immigrants. Swedish Gypsies look White. These guys certainly don't look White.

They are not, do you think I'm dumb?
The family is called "karoli-family" and they have roots in Norway. Romanian gypsies only came to Norway after Romania entered the EU. These people have roots in Norway for hundreds of years. There are some "whiter" looking ones like this man:

However the majority still look like swarthy gypsies, you're pulling shit out of your ass.

[RN97]

Yeah, phenotype-wise they have retained a lot of "brown skin" due to endogamy but still are more "western looking" than South Asians , the one thing conencting them is their brown skin, but genetically, even most Balkan ones are either 50% European, with ones further north, especially in the British Isles being more European.



Read this:

So there we have it. The Romani derive from lower castes populations from the northwest Indian subcontinent who seem to have left ~1,000 years ago. Over time they admixed with local populations, and are now 50-70% non-South Asian, with some groups being ~90% European (e.g., Welsh Romani). And, they have a long history as an endogamous group, judging by their inbreeding.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gn.../#.WM2wx_nyvIU

Sure but a large part of their ancestry is middle eastern as well. I know middle easterners are closer to whites than south asians, but still. They are not white or European by any means. They're like Brazilian mulattos. A group of their own. Not south asian, middle eastern nor European. That's why they should have their own nation.

[Mortimer]

Sure but a large part of their ancestry is middle eastern as well. I know middle easterners are closer to whites than south asians, but still. They are not white or European by any means. They're like Brazilian mulattos. A group of their own. Not south asian, middle eastern nor European. That's why they should have their own nation.

I agree they are their own thing and should have a own nation. Even some indians want their own nation like tamil tigers, why not gypsies?