British media more anti-ziganist then german media?

**Mortimer** · 03-18-2017, 02:47 AM

I live in Austria (German speaking) and our media is much less anti-gypsy then the british, do you think there are more gypsies in the UK or why is that?

A quick google search shows this

https://www.google.at/search?q=no+gy...y+crime+gang&*

Nigel Farage in Bulgaria to meet local Gypsies (he is afraid they will come to Britain)

They even have signs that they dont allow gypsies or travellers

I dont know about other countries because I dont speak the langauges like spanish, italian, greek, bulgarian etc. I can only compare english vs german

**♥ Lily ♥** · 03-18-2017, 03:01 AM

I don't think it's 'antiziganist' for the media to report on crimes committed by gypsies;- I think you're being paranoid.

Every single day the UK media reports on crimes to the public - whether it's done by British people or by other people.

Should we accuse the UK media of being 'Anti-British' whenever we read about crimes that are done by British people?! Because if any of the crimes reported were done by non-British people, then suddenly it's seen as being 'racist' or 'prejudiced.' Pff!

You're google-searching in the English news language for gypsy crimes only, then when you see the expected results for that particular search in the English language, you're then accusing the UK media of being 'antiziganist'

simply for reporting on only some of the crimes committed by gypsies.

The UK media doesn't report on all of the crimes done by the amount of Romani gypsies who are currently being held inside of UK jails - because there's statistically too many cases to report on all of the crimes.

So... no.

(By the way, the German media probably would report on the amount of crimes done by gypsies in Germany if their media wasn't being silenced and oppressed by Angela Merkel from reporting the truth to the German people.)

**♥ Lily ♥** · 03-18-2017, 03:09 AM

I'd like to ask you now if gypsies are anti-British for committing so many crimes towards British people in our country? Their criminal behaviour is offensive to people... robbing, mugging and stabbing people, dossing on peoples private land, trashing the countryside with litter and using peoples private land as a sewage dump, etc.... very inconsiderate and disrespectful behaviour.

Now they want respect back from us, huh?!

Well I've got some news for you cos respect just doesn't work like that in life;- you can't just demand respect from people - especially when they commit a lot of crimes! You have to earn respect from people if you want to be respected and liked!

Do you think the media should be silenced and censored from reporting the truth when gypsies commit crimes?

If gypsies want to be respected then they'll need to buck-up and behave respectfully and stop committing crimes. Only then will the media stop reporting on the amount of crimes that are being done by gypsies.

**RN97** · 03-18-2017, 03:36 AM

Originally Posted by ♥ Lily ♥

I don't think it's 'antiziganist' for the media to report on crimes committed by gypsies - I think you're being paranoid.

Every single day the UK media reports on crimes to the public - whether it's done by British people or by other people.

Should we accuse the UK media (and all of the local regional news sources across the UK too) of being 'anti-British' everyday when we read about crimes that are done by British people?!

You're only google-searching in the English language for gypsy crimes - then when you see the expected results for that particular search in the English language, you're then accusing the media of being 'antiziganist' - simply for reporting on only some of the crimes found in your search.

The media doesn't report on all of the crimes done by the amount of Romanian gypsies who are currently being held inside UK jails, because there's statistically too many to report.

So... no.

It still is though. Undoubtedly. I'm not saying that it's unjustified as gypsies (at least in Norway, assuming it's pretty much the same in the UK) don't know how to act for some reason.
The thing is that somehow in the UK, even if gypsies historically are one of the most persecuted groups out there they don't have the same victim status as Muslim Pakistanis do for example. I think it's due to the fact that they're considered "European(sometimes even white)" and part of the christian culture. You'll notice that the British media often calls them "eastern Europeans", "Bulgarians" or "Romanians". Rarely they'll call them "gypsies", "Roma" etc. and if they do they'll always insert a eastern European group in there, like "Bulgarian romas" etc. I've even seen comments from Brits claiming they can't be racist against gypsies, because they're eastern Europeans and the same race or whatever.
That's not to say that they also don't have some sort of automatic victim card, but it's a lot weaker for them compared to muslim groups. However TBH, I don't see the massive uproar about their crimes. It's mainly littering, pick-pocketing, sleeping in illegal places etc. It's petty for the most part compared to the more violent crimes committed by Africans, Pakistanis, Muslims and so on which often are crimes like rape, murder and so on. Again, it seems that idiocy committed by gypsies, like some stories of how they killed swans to eat them etc. really sells so it's no wonder it's being pushed by right wing medias. Here in Norway I swear on my life that I've never seen a normal gypsy, all of them are homeless beggars (and perhaps also pickpocket, IDK). The main point is that it's much more socially acceptable to publish "bad" articles about gypsies compared to other groups who also deserve such articles, but TBH I really don't care. They are IMO a problem population unlike most other groups, so maybe they should clean their act up then these articles will not be published.