1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,960 Given: 9,127 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,788 Given: 1,803 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,722 Given: 1,300 |
Are you retard? İ wrote that for Turks not for you. Ofc Georgian-Chechen not Turkic and dont give f*ck about. The funny thing is your involvement and nothing else. Crimean Tatars identify with us and they even have Turkmen ancestry for southern coast Tatars from 13th century. Off topic.
Sorry Georgians and Chechens and other members for going off topic.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 753 Given: 650 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 998 Given: 821 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,939 Given: 916 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,351 Given: 1,018 |
Georgian students
Chechen students
Thumbs Up |
Received: 264 Given: 0 |
Circassians are not much different from other North Caucasians, neither paricularly lighter nor darker. If anything then maybe on average a bit darker because they have more mediterranean types which rather not exist in the NE Caucasus.
However Georgians are for sure darker than North Caucasians, apart from maybe some people in Dagestan (who are like a mix of Chechens and Azeris). Georgians also don't belong to the North Caucasian cluster (Chechens, Ingush, Avars, Ossetians, Darginians, Balkars) and light Georgians look surprisingly rather like Romanians and SE Europeans than like Chechens or other North Caucasians despite the close proximity.
Chechens simply look Chechen, so it's not difficult that Georgians look more European but even more Middle Eastern. If however the question would be who is lighter then it's Chechens who are lighter. I also wonder why Georgians are often mentioned together with Chechens as if they were related. The people here really don't know who Chechens are.
Islam in Russia is rather an ideological than a racial matter.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks