Why US is alpha in Mena but not in East Asia?

[Wadaad]

I like how u can't deny my main point though.

But yes, I am aware of that. What's been allowed to happen since WWII is nothing if not a travesty. I hope one day Americans will wise up to the Jewish menance but it doesn't seem likely. At least we still have the militias and a high per capita gun ownership rate,so it wouldn't be easy to invade us no matter what.

you know other places with high gun per capita ownership?

Yemen
Somalia
Afghanistan

[Dr. Robotnik the Subbotnik]

because god's chosen

[Profileid]

you know other places with high gun per capita ownership?

Yemen
Somalia
Afghanistan

You're forgetting Balkans.

Beside,those three countries had/have CIVIL war. Only Afghanistan was truly invaded by a foreign power and that was us.

[Turkminator]

Think of Hiroshima and Vietnam. America has a moral responsibility in Asia due to its bloody history. They are still able to bomb Asia back to the stone age.

[jingorex]

Mmmm.. İ watch news and follow international affairs a bit. US acts like a master alpha man in Mena, Afghanistan etc. Drone strikes, carpets bombing, mother of all bombs on terrorists with Kalashnikov then you see US leaders who say 'we are committed to destroy terror and US still there forever,
Then you look at East Asia... They bully US but US silent. Even a small country of 25 million like Nord Korea call US president monkey, make missiles tests, threats to US to attack US allies like South Korea.. But US silent.
Why US is alpha in Mena and beta in East Asia?

The US was outnumbered 10 to 1 in the first Korean war and yet slaughtered 200,000 chinese in their own back yard.

You were saying?

[Böri]

The US was outnumbered 10 to 1 in the first Korean war and yet slaughtered 200,000 chinese in their own back yard.

You were saying?

Man I don't deny there are Alpha Americans like Trump. But America was beta in Korean War. Chinese had no aircraft or advanced weapons but still pushed Americans. It was surprise for whole world America lost against China which just finished own civil war. General Mac Arthur not listened to and America/Truman didnt dare to expand war to China or use nukes. Today world very different.

[Nebuchadnezzar]

Big talk right there. Medium and small powers yet Iraq was the 4th strongest military in the world when US invaded and immobilized it in a few days.

Quit barking bro. I know you have a good head on your shoulders, but you're letting personal emotions cloud your judgment. There are no men on this planet with bigger balls than the American establishment. The fact that they tolerate so much bullshit from shitholes all over the world, balkans, middle east, eastern europe etc etc, while still maintaing such professionality is admirable. You don't see the US pulling any sneak moves, they'll look these dictators dead in the eye. Saddam talked all that tough shit until he got yanked out of a hole, suddenly he went full victim mode during trial. Khaddafi got a knife in his ass once NATO immobilized his air force, so much for popular support. Syria has been protected by Russia and given good air defence, the US will 100% shit on all that if they decide to go in as in Iraq.

Sick of all these fucking excuses. The US invades only after long times of warnings and tolerating all kinds of human rights abuses. Add to that they never start claiming land nor resources. People only know how to complain.

I would love to see such claims come to fruition, but reality couldn't be more further from the truth.
While Iraq's army might've had large number in terms of sheer size after the Iraq-Iran war, truth was the country was in dept, ofcourse when the US attacked iraq in the first gulf war (1990-91) it did so with coalition of around 32 countries at the time, on which the US & UN afterwards imposed cripling sanctions, not to mention the "Oil for food" scandal, an instrument of systemized theft of Iraq's natural ressources, and if that wasn't enough, measures of cruelity to stave & abuse the average iraqi citizen was also result of this UN program.

So who did the brave americans fight against in 2003 and their new even bigger coalition fight against ?
A bankrupt nation, with a dictator way past his expiration date, crippled by sanctions, hunger, poverty and neglect.

So in essence, Americucks since WW2 have used their military might upon nations that are probably 2-5% of it's capabilities, size and wealth, these are the only odds, the US went up against, and now they're not even doing that anymore, they're busy fighting shoeless lice infested jihadis in pickup trucks, they've been doing that for 15+ years now, without any real sight of ending.

Hell even non-nuclear countries such as Iran, have figured out the americucks, and called them out on their bluff.




Having said that, my opinions and dislike of the US, aren't directed at US citizens ofcourse, they're being screwed in a different way.

[N1019]

Hell even non-nuclear countries such as Iran, have figured out the americucks, and called them out on their bluff.

Yeah, I'm sure they are basking in the glory of that massive victory.

You call that figuring out the Americucks? I don't think so. Figuring out the Americucks would be developing radar and air defence systems that can see American stealth aircraft and shoot their ICBMs out of the sky. I suspect we'll be waiting awhile before "Eyeran" has those capabilities. Have you seen an Iranian made car lately? Or their toy F-313 aircraft? Not very impressive.

[RenaRyuguu]

Cuz they kick out all foreigners

[Westbrook]

Because US doesn't go to war over insults or to impress morons, war happens for resources and strategic interests