0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,582 Given: 1,066 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
Weird. It seems that your DNA.Land on 23andMe was actually more accurate.
Maybe try also re-uploading your 23andMe to DNA.Land and see what it says. They are sometimes updating their algorithms, but people need to re-upload to see their new ancestry composition results.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,042 Given: 1,392 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,582 Given: 1,066 |
Euskaldun (Basque) strong
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
They are quite similar, but the main differences are lack of Ashkenazi, Oceanian & African:
Also some % of your Mediterranean Islander was added to Southwest European, it seems:
36% vs. 44% Southwest Euro
16% vs. 9.7% Med Islander
1.2% vs. 0% Ashkenazi
0% vs. 2% South/Central Euro
7.6% vs. 8.8% Northwest Euro
5.9% vs. 6.8% Northeast Euro*
28% vs. 26% Native American
2.4% vs. 3.2% Amazonian
1.5% vs. 0% Oceanian**
1.3% vs. 0% West African
*But with 23andMe you have 3.8% Finnish + 2.1% North Slavic, and here it is just Finnish.
**Ancestry gives you Melanesian, but when you upload it to DNA.Land it doesn't. Weird.
========
Edit:
You also didn't have any South/Central Euro with 23andMe, with Ancestry you have 2%.
I guess that on 23andMe it was counted as part of your Med Islander or of Ashkenazi.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,582 Given: 1,066 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,000 Given: 12,785 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,956 Given: 11,667 |
Sad that the Native American percentage isn't in depth. It should specify a high percentage of 'Andid'.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,582 Given: 1,066 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks