0
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/9...ts-limits.htmlIn fact, Nature imposes a fundamental stature-cap: Mammals in general load their bones to about a quarter of their breaking strength during routine activities. If you doubled height, bone cross-sectional area would increase fourfold (radius squared), while weight (volume) increases eightfold (2 x 2 x 2)! Our bones would be overloaded, and breaks would be commonplace.
Bad as this sounds, things would actually be even worse, says LaBarbera: 12-foot-tall humans would be prone to collapsed arches, bad knees and excruciating back problems; 18-foot tall humans would be immobilized.
So, height limits, absolutely. But fat chance we've already peaked in body girth.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/...encequestions3John Wass, a specialist in acromegalic gigantism at the University of Oxford, reckons it would be impressive to survive for long if you grew taller than 9ft.
First, high blood pressure in the legs, caused by the sheer volume of blood in the arteries, can burst blood vessels and cause varicose ulcers. An infection of just such an ulcer eventually killed Wadlow.
With modern antibiotics, ulcers are less of an issue now, and most people with acromegalic gigantism eventually die because of complications from heart problems. "Keeping the blood going round such an enormous circulation becomes a huge strain for the heart," says Wass.
Bookmarks