Evolution destroyed by smallest microorganisms...

[Rethel]

[Sacrificed Ram]

Guy, the only fact that you is a new being different from your father and your mother, it is already evolution, you aren't a copy of your parents, but a new being.

I hope you don't have cognitive dissonance in this moment.

[Bobby Martnen]

Guy, the only fact that you is a new being different from your father and your mother, it is already evolution, you aren't a copy of your parents, but a new being.

I hope you don't have cognitive dissonance in this moment.

He's not identical to his parents, but he also didn't come from a monkey.

[Smitty]

Guy, the only fact that you is a new being different from your father and your mother, it is already evolution, you aren't a copy of your parents, but a new being.

I hope you don't have cognitive dissonance in this moment.

This isn't remotely the same as the changes involved in evolutionary theory. No new genetic material has been introduced in the birth of a child. It has been rearranged, yes, but not added.

[Bobby Martnen]

This isn't remotely the same as the changes involved in evolutionary theory. No new genetic material has been introduced in the birth of a child. It has been rearranged, yes, but not added.

Exactly. Microevolution, like a wolf to a dog, is true and makes sense. Macroevolution, from fish to person, is utter nonsense.

[Demon Revival]

Exactly. Microevolution, like a wolf to a dog, is true and makes sense. Macroevolution, from fish to person, is utter nonsense.

Macroevolution is only an example of continuous microevolution.

We do not come from chimps but we both come from the same older, more primitive organism. Greater apes do not come from monkeys but split up from the same parent population even further back. You could go further back and say placentals and marsupials don't descend from one another but they descend from the same parent population. and such parent population also had a further back parent population with many layers and dead ends of extinct descendants and the currently living echidnas, etc etc.

[Bobby Martnen]

Macroevolution is only an example of continuous microevolution.

We do not come from chimps but we both come from the same older, more primitive organism. Greater apes do not come from monkeys but split up from the same parent population even further back.

Microevolution can select for existing traits, but it can't create new ones.
Dogs are just wolves that have been bred to have only the traits for friendliness and sociability.

[Demon Revival]

Microevolution can select for existing traits, but it can't create new ones.
Dogs are just wolves that have been bred to have only the traits for friendliness and sociability.

For the practical matter it can. Selective pressure can lead to genes manifesting themselves in different manners and even performing different functions.

There are mutated rats who can regrow limbs, while no mammal has this capability. Flight/gliding has been developed independently at least 7 times in insects, pterosaurs, birds, multituberculates (extinct mammals), bats, squirrels, colugos.

Aquatic adaptations also have arisen at least 4 times in mammals: whales/dolphins, carnivores (phocids and similar), rodents (beavers), monotremes (echidnas).

[Bobby Martnen]

For the practical matter it can. Selective pressure can lead to genes manifesting themselves in different manners and even performing different functions.

There are mutated rats who can regrow limbs, while no mammal has this capability. Flight/gliding has been developed independently at least 7 times in insects, pterosaurs, birds, multituberculates (extinct mammals), bats, squirrels, colugos.

Aquatic adaptations also have arisen at least 4 times in mammals: whales/dolphins, carnivores (phocids and similar), rodents (beavers), monotremes (echidnas).

Read this https://answersingenesis.org/

[Demon Revival]

Read this https://answersingenesis.org/

Evolution does not really contradict creationism. It merely flows the principle that nothing is ever static.