1
What you refer to as 'anarchy' is simply you feeling uncomfortable that you don't have complete control of others. How would it be 'anarchy like in TA' if you can be charged for making violent threats towards someone? Or for harassment?
We have a different concept of what laws are for. I believe laws exist to protect people from physical harm and shady practices. In other words behavior that has real consequences that you can point to (a bloody face from an assault, a building that isn't up to code and therefore a danger to its tenants, etc.) You believe laws should include... naughty words, which have.... what type of consequences? Feeling bad about one's self? Awww.... hugs! It'll be okay, Melki.
If you think someone is a victim because an obnoxious person said naughty words to them, then you're a man-child who thinks other adults in society are children as well. There is no way around it. It's insulting to an actual victim of a crime to claim someone saying, 'Fuck you, kike! Hitler was right!' is a victim also. It's also degrading to the person being insulted that you feel they need to be protected by naughty words by the state. You're stripping them of being adults and turning them into children. That's exactly what the Left wants to do. It wants to make children of us all.
Also, this shit rarely ever happens and so why do you even need to make it an issue except to create children of us all? I can count on one hand how many times I've heard people say racial slurs at someone (almost all by Blacks towards others). I've never heard someone being insulted for their religion.
It's sad and revealing that you think the way people behave on an internet forum where no one knows who they are is how people behave in real life where people do know who they are. Maybe you should get out more. In the real world people think naughty words, they don't say it because if you say them you might get beat up. It's very rare for someone to get racial/ethnic/religious with their insults.
Bookmarks