Craniometric Oracle for Europid Subtypes

[Grishnack]

Same here man. I got Atlanto-Nordid as well but I have always been classified as Dinaric or Dinaro-Pontid

I was always classified as Pontid-Alpine or something like that.

[Lucas]

Nice work. It's basically the same what Polish Anthrpoology School developed '50-'60. It was Wanke aproxiamtion and used only basic racial elements like Nordic, Med, etc.

But everybody must be aware that doing measurements by himself using rule or tape is completely innacurate becasue few mm could have crucial value for being for example brachy or meso, or messorhine and leptorrhine.

Using it to metric series from literature although it's legit.

[Lucas]

Results for Afalou-bou-Rhummel Iberomaurusians from Epipaleolithic Algeria. They were described as Cro-Magnoids, so the results make a lot of sense.
.

If you entered values for living people in the spreadsheet you can't measure skulls or vice-versa!
You must make second spreadsheet with averages for cranial series only...

BTW what is Anglo_Friterpian average ?

[Siginulfo]

If you entered values for living people in the spreadsheet you can't measure skulls or vice-versa!
You must make second spreadsheet with averages for cranial series only...

Obviously I applied tissue thickness (for Caucasoids) on the relevant measurements.

[Lucas]

Obviously I applied tissue thickness (for Caucasoids) on the relevant measurements.

But people don't know that. It's better to make two spreadsheets with averages for living and skulls.