Nations with false identity

[Hadouken]

No, in terms of ancestra contributions, the Iranians were never a big factor in Anatolia, unless you count Kurds in the Eastern parts. But the Original Seljuc turks, which assimilated the Anatolians , had Iranian male lines based on their J2 and R1.

we are not "iranians" though . we are kurds

[Shahqulu]

No, in terms of ancestra contributions, the Iranians were never a big factor in Anatolia, unless you count Kurds in the Eastern parts. But the Original Seljuc turks, which assimilated the Anatolians , had Iranian male lines based on their J2 and R1.

Seljuk dynasty were masters of Iran, they were from the Kynyk branch of the Oghuz. It is extremely pathetic that you are trying to claim your foreign masters as your own kin.

[Laberia]

This was the opinion of a prosfig, i.e. people who arrived in Greece from Asia Minor about the endopi, i.e. natives of Greece. But we have to be correct. So, later i will continue with the opinion of the endopi about prosfiges.
This fearful history of Greece continue.

[Полковник 95]

It is hilarious you are trying to claim your foreign masters as your own kin, pathetic.

Well, one can say the same about Turks, I mean those turkified Anatolian peasants who think they would not look like Greek and Kurd.

[zarzian]

Says the pseudo-Iranic. The difference between Scythians/Andronovo/Sintashta and modern Iranians is like a difference between Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals LOL.



You are basically a mish mash of browns folks (elamo-dravidians, semites etc) who got fucked in the ass by original Iranic speakers, and then by Arabs in th 7th century. I would call you semito-dravidians who dream about being descended from Scythians LOL


At least Turks always get Turkmens in their oracles, who are Oghuz speakers from Central Asia.

Why are you crying, don't chimp out at facts you little donkey fucker. You're argument has no basis, the latest DNA research has put away the theory of Iranians descending from Andronovo, and Sintashta. The Iranian Split off from PIE has been pushed back 1500 years, making it one of the earliest Split offs right after Anatolian, and the latest PIE theories from Mathieson, Reich, Lazaridis and Max Planc Institute are putting PIE in Armenian Highlands and Western Iran, and they have all admitted that the Steppe theory cannot explain Anatolian languages, which would most likely mean that Western Iranians were also never from the Steppe but their ancestors contributed to the Steppe, through Maykop. Add in the fact that it is now being proposed that the Mitanni were actually Iranian rather the Indo-Aryan, also that according for Lazaridis, a population similar to the Iranian Chalcolithic from the Kurdistan Caves in Western Iran contributed to half of Yamnaya's ancestry, then we Can say that Iranians are closer to the Original PIE then all other Indo-Europeans. Now compare that to
A bunch of greco-semetic Anatolians which speak a NE Asian language which was forced on them.

[Cristiano viejo]

Iberia is not a nation, you mudafucka.

[Voskos]

Narnja is another example of fake nation.

[zarzian]

we are not "iranians" though . we are kurds

Ok bro, but Kurds are within the Iranian sphere in terms of linguistic, genetic and cultural affinities.

[Shahqulu]

Why are you crying, don't chimp out at facts you little donkey fucker. You're argument has no basis, the latest DNA research has put away the theory of Iranians descending from Andronovo, and Sintashta. The Iranian Split off from PIE has been pushed back 1500 years, making it one of the earliest Split offs right after Anatolian, and the latest PIE theories from Mathieson, Reich, Lazaridis and Max Planc Institute are putting PIE in Armenian Highlands and Western Iran, and they have all admitted that the Steppe theory cannot explain Anatolian languages, which would most likely mean that Western Iranians were also never from the Steppe but their ancestors contributed to the Steppe, through Maykop. Add in the fact that it is now being proposed that the Mitanni were actually Iranian rather the Indo-Aryan, also that according for Lazaridis, a population similar to the Iranian Chalcolithic from the Kurdistan Caves in Western Iran contributed to half of Yamnaya's ancestry, then we Can say that Iranians are closer to the Original PIE then all other Indo-Europeans. Now compare that tohy are you crying, don't chimp out at facts you little donkey fucker. You're argument has no basis, the latest DNA research has put away the theory of Iranians descending from Andronovo, and Sintashta. The Iranian Split off from PIE has been pushed back 1500 years, making it one of the earliest Split offs right after Anatolian, and the latest PIE theories from Mathieson, Reich, Lazaridis and Max Planc Institute are putting PIE in Armenian Highlands and Western Iran, and they have all admitted that the Steppe theory cannot explain Anatolian languages, which would most likely mean that Western Iranians were also never from the Steppe but their ancestors contributed to the Steppe, through Maykop. Add in the fact that it is now being proposed that the Mitanni were actually Iranian rather the Indo-Aryan, also that according for Lazaridis, a population similar to the Iranian Chalcolithic from the Kurdistan Caves in Western Iran contributed to half of Yamnaya's ancestry, then we Can say that Iranians are closer to the Original PIE then all other Indo-Europeans. Now compare that tohy are you crying, don't chimp out at facts you little donkey fucker. You're argument has no basis, the latest DNA research has put away the theory of Iranians descending from Andronovo, and Sintashta. The Iranian Split off from PIE has been pushed back 1500 years, making it one of the earliest Split offs right after Anatolian, and the latest PIE theories from Mathieson, Reich, Lazaridis and Max Planc Institute are putting PIE in Armenian Highlands and Western Iran, and they have all admitted that the Steppe theory cannot explain Anatolian languages, which would most likely mean that Western Iranians were also never from the Steppe but their ancestors contributed to the Steppe, through Maykop. Add in the fact that it is now being proposed that the Mitanni were actually Iranian rather the Indo-Aryan, also that according for Lazaridis, a population similar to the Iranian Chalcolithic from the Kurdistan Caves in Western Iran contributed to half of Yamnaya's ancestry, then we Can say that Iranians are closer to the Original PIE then all other Indo-Europeans. Now compare that tohy are you crying, don't chimp out at facts you little donkey fucker. You're argument has no basis, the latest DNA research has put away the theory of Iranians descending from Andronovo, and Sintashta. The Iranian Split off from PIE has been pushed back 1500 years, making it one of the earliest Split offs right after Anatolian, and the latest PIE theories from Mathieson, Reich, Lazaridis and Max Planc Institute are putting PIE in Armenian Highlands and Western Iran, and they have all admitted that the Steppe theory cannot explain Anatolian languages, which would most likely mean that Western Iranians were also never from the Steppe but their ancestors contributed to the Steppe, through Maykop. Add in the fact that it is now being proposed that the Mitanni were actually Iranian rather the Indo-Aryan, also that according for Lazaridis, a population similar to the Iranian Chalcolithic from the Kurdistan Caves in Western Iran contributed to half of Yamnaya's ancestry, then we Can say that Iranians are closer to the Original PIE then all other Indo-Europeans. Now compare that to

Did you just shit blood?

It is very well documented that pre-Iranic Iran was inhabited by Elamo-Dravidian speakers and Semites who were your ancestors. Keep dreaming about being PIE and shit tho.

[SardiniaAtlantis]

Israel. We wuz all Hebrewz.