2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 159 Given: 342 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,378 Given: 3,032 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 159 Given: 342 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 23 Given: 1 |
I do agree with you in this point. Here in Brazil for example i see a lot of light skinned mestizos who call themselves white, but around IBGE's numbers there are actual europids (like myself). The problem is that even some brown skinned mestizos call themselves white in my "country", and since IBGE racial database population is based upon self classification, they can't really deny anything.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,426 Given: 4,139 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 159 Given: 342 |
In Mexico it's view differently only Castizos and Criollos called themselves white.
Mexico isn't Peru Mexico contains a lot colonial Euros is estimated Mexico has the third population of whites after Brazil and Argentina how ever in.a country with 120 million people is really almost nothing.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 23 Given: 1 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,414 Given: 1,414 |
10% of mexicans are criollos (90%+ European) and about 20% are predominantly white (80%+ European) if we go by that then yes
cause 20% is alot bro, believe 10-15% is probably more accurate
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,414 Given: 1,414 |
white mexican def is whiter than DR standards for example, im a white Dominican and thats what im labeled as and classified as such by dominicans, my cedula says white "blanco" so
but DR's true real colonial white (85%+ European) is only about 1-3%, if me included types and slightly more non white (about 5% less white than me) then together blancos in DR are at 15%
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,426 Given: 4,139 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks