Which Amerindian ethnicity or tribe are the most West Eurasian-shifted?

[Maguzanci]

Just wondering. From the results that I saw, pure Amerindians are around 25-30% WNA-related if ANE/MA-1 is around 2/3 WNA-like.

I have seen some pcas where they cluster close to Central Asians and WNA-ENA intermediate pops.

Like this one:



I wonder which is the Native American population that is closer to South Central Asians in the above pca?

[AphroditeWorshiper]

Andeans and some Amazonian tribes imo

[Maguzanci]

Andeans and some Amazonian tribes imo

Really? How much?

[Erronkari]

In my opinion north mexican tribes, like Seri, Rarámuri, Mayo, Pima and Kikapu in northern Mexico and many tribes of the United States.
Even I agree with you, probably many andean folks and some amazonian tribes could be, also.

[Maguzanci]

..

[AphroditeWorshiper]

Really? How much?

yeah, I don't know exactly, but is what I think

I remember an image of genetic clusters where Andeans where the ones more similar/close to Central Asians. Also the highest ANE is found in some Amazonian tribes, maybe are these two groups

[Maguzanci]

In my opinion north mexican tribes, like Seri, Rarámuri, Mayo, Pima and Kikapu in northern Mexico and many tribes of the United States.
Even I agree with you, probably many andean folks and some amazonian tribes could be, also.

Thank you for your reply. This is very interesting.

I wonder if Northern and Central American Natives are more West Eurasian-related on average than those from South America?

[Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin]

What "pure " native samples are you talking about? Never seen any thats 1/4 to 1/3 WNA

[Maguzanci]

What "pure " native samples are you talking about? Never seen any thats 1/4 to 1/3 WNA

For example

Karitiana (they always scored 100% Amerindian in calculators with the Native component)

Gedrosia K6

Spoiler!

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 East_Asian 66.4
2 Ancestral_North_Eurasian 21.49
3 West_European_Hunter_Gartherer 7.35
4 Ancestral_South_Eurasian 4.75

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Pima 3.8
2 Clovis 7.51
3 Altaian 13.93
4 Kyrgyz 15.56
5 Sherpa 18.14
6 Eskimo 18.34
7 Kusunda 19.26
8 Kalmyk 20.14
9 Cambodian 24.72
10 Uygur 25.18
11 Hazara 25.21
12 Nganasan 29.22
13 Tibetan 29.74
14 Mongola 33.79
15 Uzbek 36.16
16 Ami 37.14
17 Han 37.9
18 Ulchi 38.09
19 Dai 39.65
20 Turkmen 46.02

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 80.3% Clovis + 19.7% Tibetan @ 1.79
2 74.6% Tibetan + 25.4% EHG @ 1.8
3 83.6% Clovis + 16.4% Ami @ 1.83
4 82.3% Clovis + 17.7% Mongola @ 1.85
5 83.9% Clovis + 16.1% Han @ 1.9
6 80.1% Clovis + 19.9% Nganasan @ 1.99
7 84% Clovis + 16% Ulchi @ 2.04
8 84.6% Clovis + 15.4% Dai @ 2.04
9 73.8% Clovis + 26.2% Kalmyk @ 2.48
10 87.8% Pima + 12.2% Kusunda @ 2.71
11 97.4% Pima + 2.6% Onge @ 2.8
12 97.9% Pima + 2.1% Andamanese @ 2.87
13 97.9% Pima + 2.1% Australian @ 2.87
14 97.9% Pima + 2.1% Papuan @ 2.87
15 72.4% Clovis + 27.6% Eskimo @ 2.99
16 98% Pima + 2% WHG @ 3.01
17 98% Pima + 2% Hungarian_KO1 @ 3.01
18 91.5% Pima + 8.5% Cambodian @ 3.03
19 96.7% Pima + 3.3% GoyetQ116 @ 3.05
20 88.8% Pima + 11.2% Sherpa @ 3.06

This sample score around both Ancient North Eurasian and West Eurasian Hunter Gatherer components at 28% combined which is a sign of WNA/WNA-like.

[Taiguaitiaoghyrmmumin]

For example

Karitiana (they always scored 100% Amerindian in calculators with the Native American component_

Gedrosia K6

Spoiler!

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 East_Asian 66.4
2 Ancestral_North_Eurasian 21.49
3 West_European_Hunter_Gartherer 7.35
4 Ancestral_South_Eurasian 4.75

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Pima 3.8
2 Clovis 7.51
3 Altaian 13.93
4 Kyrgyz 15.56
5 Sherpa 18.14
6 Eskimo 18.34
7 Kusunda 19.26
8 Kalmyk 20.14
9 Cambodian 24.72
10 Uygur 25.18
11 Hazara 25.21
12 Nganasan 29.22
13 Tibetan 29.74
14 Mongola 33.79
15 Uzbek 36.16
16 Ami 37.14
17 Han 37.9
18 Ulchi 38.09
19 Dai 39.65
20 Turkmen 46.02

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 80.3% Clovis + 19.7% Tibetan @ 1.79
2 74.6% Tibetan + 25.4% EHG @ 1.8
3 83.6% Clovis + 16.4% Ami @ 1.83
4 82.3% Clovis + 17.7% Mongola @ 1.85
5 83.9% Clovis + 16.1% Han @ 1.9
6 80.1% Clovis + 19.9% Nganasan @ 1.99
7 84% Clovis + 16% Ulchi @ 2.04
8 84.6% Clovis + 15.4% Dai @ 2.04
9 73.8% Clovis + 26.2% Kalmyk @ 2.48
10 87.8% Pima + 12.2% Kusunda @ 2.71
11 97.4% Pima + 2.6% Onge @ 2.8
12 97.9% Pima + 2.1% Andamanese @ 2.87
13 97.9% Pima + 2.1% Australian @ 2.87
14 97.9% Pima + 2.1% Papuan @ 2.87
15 72.4% Clovis + 27.6% Eskimo @ 2.99
16 98% Pima + 2% WHG @ 3.01
17 98% Pima + 2% Hungarian_KO1 @ 3.01
18 91.5% Pima + 8.5% Cambodian @ 3.03
19 96.7% Pima + 3.3% GoyetQ116 @ 3.05
20 88.8% Pima + 11.2% Sherpa @ 3.06

This sample score around both Ancient North Eurasian and West Eurasian Hunter Gatherer components at 28% combined which is a sign of WNA/WNA-like.

Yea I wanted to know where you got the kit number so I can verify myself

and thats ANE. Thats not really west Eurasian