Myanthropologies has officially ordered an ancestry dna kit

[Myanthropologies]

Ehnicity or race, same thing really. If a dna test is able to tell your ethnicity then that means that ethnicity is genetically identifiable thus making it biological, which means it's a race not just a socially constructed ethnicity












Can you provide sources for this? If there are white people (or any other race) stealing black resources, then I am against it. I believe resources on black/african lands should belong to the locals not foreigners.


The country's more educated and richer may have higher genetic intelligence than the country's avarage. That's how they became high class in their country in the first place

Here are your sources
https://www.google.com/amp/www.indep...636.html%3Famp

https://www.brilliantearth.com/conflict-diamond-trade/

Also, it's not that the country's rich are genetically more intelligent, it's that they have better inherited wealth. Same thing goes with aframs vs american ashkenazis. I don't understand why your examples that always compare two people in obviously unequal situations justifies that it's genetic. In order to prove that it is genetic, you have to eliminate all other factors first. I have already showed you that African immigrants in America that have wealth are actually overrepresented at elite univeristies just like American Ashkenazi Jews are.

Lastly, ethnicity is real and nobody denied that. But subspecies/races don't exist among humans. We are once race.

[Myanthropologies]

This is exactly what I wanted to say. African immigrants are doing better than Aframs, because they are certainly not your average Africans. Just like MyAnthro is not an average Afghan that can't read and write and grows poppy to make a living.

What? Most Afghans go to school and learn how to read and write, and they do not grow drugs for a living. How do you expect your debates to be taken seriously in an academic fashion if you buy into stereotypes more than actual facts?

It doesn't matter if African immigrants are or aren't your average africans, given their economic and environmental conditions (i.e. not having to struggle to feed themselves), and the fact that they are Renfrew at a much more even playing field compared to other races because of those factors, that makes them more useful feed comparison. You need to learn to understand what is good data and what isn't. The IQ data isnt. When you perform a science expirement, and you are trying to figure out which of two plants grown faster, do you think it's more reliable to test them under the same conditions to recieve a valid answers or have one be properly watered while leaving the other malurished? Obviously both plants have to be in the same conditions and given the same treatments, otherwise the results won't be reliable (unless you're using one as a control group). Same thing with iq. You can't argue that it's genetic because there are clearly other factors such as inequality and starvation that are in the way. And it is clear that when these factors don't exist (in the case of African immigrants), they perform very very well.

[Governor]

Let me guess, you'll score Balochi+Pashtun mostly.

[Myanthropologies]

Let me guess, you'll score Balochi+Pashtun mostly.

Pashtun isn't a category on ancestry dna, but Balochi is actually a category on some GEDmatch calculators, and I imagine I would score some of it.

[Babak]

You'll definitely get tajik_pamiri in your results though

[Leto]

What? Most Afghans go to school and learn how to read and write, and they do not grow drugs for a living. How do you expect your debates to be taken seriously in an academic fashion if you buy into stereotypes more than actual facts?

Afghanistan has a very low literacy rate. And it is the largest producer of opium. Both are facts.

Lastly, ethnicity is real and nobody denied that. But subspecies/races don't exist among humans. We are once race.

I don't wanna argue with you any longer. Not interesting to me. I value sites like this because the number of libtards and race denialists is significantly smaller, while many members are race realists and sick of political correctness.
I'll be glad to see your results, because I'm interested in groups such as Pashtuns and Pamiris, but that's all.

[Leto]

Ehnicity or race, same thing really. If a dna test is able to tell your ethnicity then that means that ethnicity is genetically identifiable thus making it biological, which means it's a race not just a socially constructed ethnicity

If a Jamaican whose family has been in the Americas for several hundreds of years is still AFRICAN genetically and not American, then race is real at least to an extent. By the same token, a third generation white Australian is still European racially and has not magically turned into an Aboriginal. DNA tests use racial categories - European (white), African (black), Asian, etc. Not just ethnic categories.

[Smitty]

If a Jamaican whose family has been in the Americas for several hundreds of years is still AFRICAN genetically and not American, then race is real at least to an extent. By the same token, a third generation white Australian is still European racially and has not magically turned into an Aboriginal. DNA tests use racial categories - European (white), African (black), Asian, etc. Not just ethnic categories.

Race is just a broader genetic classification than ethnicity. Both are somewhat fluid, in that definitions vary, but both are based on real differences.

[Leto]

Race is just a broader genetic classification than ethnicity. Both are somewhat fluid, in that definitions vary, but both are based on real differences.

I can agree. However, ethnicity is heavily related to culture and things like language, religion, etc. A person of Polish descent that speaks Hindi as a first language and follows Hinduism is not really Polish anymore, in my opinion. Just like an Indian that speaks Polish natively and practices Roman Catholicism would be quite foreign in India. However, their racial background remains the same, whatever the culture.
I'm not a biology scientist, but I can literally smell cultural Marxism in that race discourse ('there's no such thing as race'), because the very same individual who repeat 'there is no such thing' would then claim 'people of color' are permanently oppressed. It's no wonder such topic as race is highly politicized these days.

[Smitty]

I can agree. However, ethnicity is heavily related to culture and things like language, religion, etc. A person of Polish descent that speaks Hindi as a first language and follows Hinduism is not really Polish anymore, in my opinion. Just like an Indian that speaks Polish natively and practices Roman Catholicism would be quite foreign in India. However, their racial background remains the same, whatever the culture.
I'm not a biology scientist, but I can literally smell cultural Marxism in that race discourse ('there's no such thing as race'), because the very same individual who repeat 'there is no such thing' would then claim 'people of color' are permanently oppressed. It's no wonder such topic as race is highly politicized these days.

Agreed. I should have specified genetic ethnicity. There is enough difference genetically between a Portuguese and a Russian that the two can be told apart by their DNA. Likewise, an African and an Asian can be.