Originally Posted by
Pahli
This is wrong in so many ways lmfao. Andronovo people were tested and this is how they came out (very non-Turkic):
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 NE_Europe 55.73
2 West_Asia 17.68
3 SW_Europe 17.59
4 South_Asia 4.08
5 Siberia 2.47
6 Americas 2.4
7 Oceania 0.04
Single Population Sharing:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Mordovian 10.44
2 Russian 12.06
3 Belarusian 13.22
4 Ukrainian 13.46
5 Polish 13.99
6 Estonian 16.06
7 Slovak 16.19
8 German_North 16.64
9 Lithuanian 16.76
10 Latvian 16.94
11 Swedish 17.14
12 Norwegian 17.21
13 Moldavian 17.91
14 Slovene 18.04
15 Tatar 18.27
16 Hungarian 19.13
17 Irish 19.81
18 Utahn_European 20.09
19 Scottish 20.11
20 Orcadian 20.33
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 73.8% Lithuanian + 26.2% Afghan_Pashtun @ 4.71
2 70.4% Latvian + 29.6% Tadjik @ 4.77
3 70.7% Lithuanian + 29.3% Tadjik @ 4.79
4 73.6% Latvian + 26.4% Afghan_Pashtun @ 4.79
5 74.8% Estonian + 25.2% Afghan_Pashtun @ 4.98
So neither genetically nor physically similar, proto-Turks were Asian and here is a sample to prove it;
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 Siberia 59.36
2 NE_Asia 17.08
3 Americas 9.89
4 NE_Europe 7.88
5 South_Asia 2.22
6 West_Asia 1.9
7 Oceania 1.37
8 South_Africa 0.31
Single Population Sharing:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Dolgan 14.89
2 Koryak 17.77
3 Yakut 17.81
4 Tuvinian 18.73
5 Chukchi 21
6 Selkup 21.98
7 Altaian 23.95
8 Mongolian 27.91
9 Eskimo 30.81
10 Oroqen 34.03
11 Nganasan 37.8
12 Afghan_Hazara 43.88
13 Daur 43.91
14 Xibo 53.08
15 Aluet 55.37
16 Chuvash 55.48
17 Nogay 56.92
18 Afghan_Uzbeki 57.17
19 Tatar 57.69
20 Tadjik 63.4
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 57.7% Koryak + 42.3% Altaian @ 3.81
2 51.4% Koryak + 48.6% Tuvinian @ 4.35
3 61.5% Koryak + 38.5% Mongolian @ 4.36
4 53% Tuvinian + 47% Chukchi @ 5.03
5 53.6% Chukchi + 46.4% Altaian @ 6.45
Bookmarks