Are most Cro-magnons simply robust Nordics?

[Wilhelm O.]

I recently stumbled upon this (https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t763893/) thread and, due to my rather short time spent learning about Taxonomy, I'd like to ask members of TheApricity what are their thoughts on this SF user's post and whether you agree with the man. If he is could it mean that most people classified as CM have really little to none CM blood?

[RN97]

They're extinct

[Wilhelm O.]

They're extinct

Still, XYZ + CM is the most prevalent phrase in most classification threads that pop up here. Just look at the one about Nietzsche, or any other including a non-Halsttat Northern European for that matter.

[RN97]

Still, XYZ + CM is the most prevalent phrase in most classification threads that pop up here. Just look at the one about Nietzsche, or any other including a non-Halsttat Northern European for that matter.

Because people can't classify at all. CM was NEVER used by any anthropologists. Not even bad ones like Lundman or Hans Gunther. CM is a bogus term, only a few on this page can classify properly IRL with measurements. NO ONE can classify properly online although some come quite close.
Original European HG ancestry peaks in general in northern European (exception being the Basque whom also have a lot of it). Therefore it is considered that the northern Europeans are the most like what the cro-magnon was, but no one is close today really. Most people classified as "CM" are just good looking folks or folks with a good jawline. That has little to nothing to do with anthropology.

[Wilhelm O.]

Well, seems like I have to change my classification. There goes my CM pride.

[Amud]

Because people can't classify at all. CM was NEVER used by any anthropologists. Not even bad ones like Lundman or Hans Gunther. CM is a bogus term, only a few on this page can classify properly IRL with measurements. NO ONE can classify properly online although some come quite close.
Original European HG ancestry peaks in general in northern European (exception being the Basque whom also have a lot of it). Therefore it is considered that the northern Europeans are the most like what the cro-magnon was, but no one is close today really. Most people classified as "CM" are just good looking folks or folks with a good jawline. That has little to nothing to do with anthropology.

It was used by Ripley: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Popul...pe:_France_VII

[RN97]

It was used by Ripley: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Popul...pe:_France_VII

That's quite freaking old and I also forgot some Hungarian used it as well, but most didn't, although you can say Borraby, Brunn etc. sorta is like using it.

[Mr. Anybody]

ı remember ı talked about cm in forum few days ago. he said me 0rh - is about cm. ı want know that what about cm 0rh -?ım 0rh - and ı have some questions for my blood and ancests...