The Reason Why Feminists Support Muslim Immigration To The West

[Anglojew]

The great paradox of modern feminism is their curious alliance with the forces of political Islam; as demonstrated in the personage of Linda Cockroach a Jihadist Sharia activist & one of the organisers at this year's "feminist" Women's March on Washington D.C. It has long perplexed conservatives -& indeed first & second-wave feminists- why third-wave feminists have not just aligned themselves with the most misogynist belief-system on the planet, Islam, but also advocate mass Muslim immigration which will inevitably bring with it aspects of Sharia law as IS already happening in the West despite claims by apologists for Islam to the contrary as well as increases in sexism, rape & violent crime towards women as we've seen most notably in Sweden & Germany of recent years.

Islam codifies sexism via Sharia law which deems women inferior. Women cannot be judges, womens' testimony is worth less than a mens in court, women also inherit less. The punishment of killing a man is more than killing a woman in S'audi Arabia for instance. There are a whole host of sexist laws against women in Sharia & Muslims' attitudes to women are also far more primitive than Westerners with women needing a male guardian to leave the house in many Islamic societies. Women cannot vote or drive in many Muslim countries. By any neutral test Muslims are backwards by Western standards when it comes to women's rights. Muslim populations have a poor track record of sexisim in comparison to Western countries;



So why would Western Feminists ally themselves with Islam & with mass Muslim immigration to the West?

Why does this logical paradox exist?

The answer is simple. Since over the previous century or so women have achieved complete legal & almost complete cultural equality (with women now outperforming men at university etc) feminists have nothing else to achieve. Yet thousands if not millions of women make their living or live by the notion that sexism is rife within society thus allowing them to not take responsibility for their own failings but instead blame it on men or the mythical "patriarchy". Feminism simply has no reason to exist anymore having achieved all its goals. Western men almost totally accept women as equal (if different). In order to justify its own existence & the existence of thousands of university courses & organisations Feminists must import more unreconstructed sexist men so they are able to "fudge" figures proving sexism still exists within our societies. Primitive Muslims prove easy pawns to achieve this goal. Muslims are somewhere between inbred troglodytes & luddites so serve to justify the on-going existence of Feminism within our societies. Even though EVERY SINGLE "outdoor" rape in Oslo in recent years was by a Muslim, for instance, feminists through their mainstream media cultural marxist propaganists can omit this detail & just claim rape is rife in Norway so therefore feminism is needed. Without Islam feminism wouldn't be needed. Western Feminism needs Islam to justify its own existence & to claim the so-called patriarchy exists.

[Al-Meksiki]

[StonyArabia]

Sarsur might mean cockroach but it's also an Arabic nickname for a short skinny person

[Heather Duval]

Gracile med.

[Nemo]

sorry, wrong spot

[Antimage]

Being anti-men is more politically correct and more accepted than being anti-refugee because the latter is racist, which is the most horrible thing one can be nowadays. I remember after a lot of german women were raped by refugees at New Year's street carneval there were feminists protesting against "Male agression" instead of simply stopping immigration.

[Jehan]

The ennemy of my ennemy is my friend.

A very short time vision. But feminism as syndicalism (at least in france) is stuck in the past. They based on there policy on there past success without seing that the world change.