Anthropology Vs Haplogroup which do you believe more?

[justme]

Which do you believe more when it comes to origins of nations and why?

[catgeorge]

60% Anthropology 40% Haplogroup.

In other words I will try to assemble as much information as possible whatever that may be.

[justme]

60% Anthropology 40% Haplogroup.

In other words I will try to assemble as much information as possible whatever that may be.

same here.... I think its obvious why... but more like 100% anthropology 0% haplogroups (europe) especially when done by government funding, and 100% anthropology and haplogroup (africa) its hard to explain, i think that europe has a history of using dna to deny people their origins, that's why I don't trust the european haplogroup, but i do trust the anthropology...

[Rethel]

Haplogroups - becasue it give direct, clear and true origin and identity of
people, not falsified by conquest, denationalization, and lack of memory.

[DarknessWin]

Haplogroups - becasue it give direct, clear and true origin and identity of
people, not falsified by conquest, denationalization, and lack of memory.

Haplogroups its just give you the first single parent Thousand years before.
Not the womens he mixed, not the womens his kids mixed with and not the race itself at all

Races belong to many different Haplogroups and you can find Niggers,Asians and pure Europeans
belong to the same Haplogroup. For example R1b Nigerians, R1b Iberians,R1b British and R1b Turkmen Asians


On the other hand Phenotypes can find the ethnicity of a man 100%

[Rethel]

Not the womens he mixed

Surely you identify with this ancient concubine who was
bought on the market or taken on war from hostile tribe...

It is called sissyness and pantywaistness...

not the womens his kids mixed with

Aha... so you are only used as inseminator who is making babies for
some foreign feminists, not for himself... this is called henpeckedness...

[DarknessWin]

Surely you identify with this ancient concubine who was
bought on the market or taken on war from hostile tribe...

It is called sissyness and pantywaistness...



Aha... so you are only used as inseminator who is making babies for
some foreign feminists, not for himself... this is called henpeckedness...

Your iq is below average like most of the north east suckers so i need to explain it better.

You are R1a, that simply mean that your first parent thousand years before was R1a.
R1a maybe he was Indian, or Pakistani, or Indoeuropean
Lets say that he was Indoeuropean

All of his kids would be R1a even if he mixed with African womens,
we speak about some 8000 years before.
Put this man in Africa and let him make bebies with nigger womens,
after 8000 years we will have an 100% nigger tribe there to belong in R1a haplogroup

We go back to Indoeuropean people and their move in europe , all of them were mixed one to another
and all of them belong to different Haplogroups and speak the same language.
The cousins and brothers from the same male forefather belong to the same haplogroup, but other indoeuropean
groups and families belong to different haplo but all of them are the same race and mixed one to another.

So they have no different in their dna and race if one is EV13,one J2,one R1b , I2 etc
The only difference is the first Parent from 8000 years before

This is haplogroup. NOTHING

[Rethel]

All of his kids would be R1a even if he mixed with African womens,
we speak about some 8000 years before.
Put this man in Africa and let him make bebies with nigger womens,
after 8000 years we will have an 100% nigger tribe there to belong in R1a haplogroup

If he would brought with his neighbout bunch of negro women here,
becaause they would want this, the children would still be IEs, not
some Bantu weirdos as you probably assume. No sane person ever
cared about race. IEs took whatever woman they want to, and still
were IEs. You, as a insecure denationalized conquered element have
problems what to do with the fact - you choose to rave about race
and pretending to be part of those who did subjugate your grandpa.

We go back to Indoeuropean people and their move in europe , all of them were mixed one to another

No, they were merring syberian Redskins, mongoloids, blacky
WHGeans, swarthy Farmerians, blacj Caucasians aso, aso, aso,
whatever they wished too. Look does not give an identity. Only
women and US Niggaz think like that... Are you one of them

and all of them belong to different Haplogroups and speak the same language.

No, you are wrong.
As every decent tribe on the face of the earth, they beliong to one
house, and this is why they speak one language of look such and such.
In meantime, they were buying women from other tribes, not looking on
race. Later, they migrated, subjugated foreign people and took whatever
women they want to - and were not bothering with your sissy problems.

the cousins and brothers from the same male forefather belong to the same haplogroup, but other indoeuropean
groups and families belong to different haplo but all of them are the same race and mixed one to another.

There is no OTHER IE groups.

This is haplogroup. NOTHING

Only a guy, who hates his father, grandfather, hates himself
and hates his sons and grandsons will say such idiotic thing,
so has to be simply insane or subjugated by some woman.

[Cristiano viejo]

Haplogroups - becasue it give direct, clear and true origin and identity of
people, not falsified by conquest, denationalization, and lack of memory.

Not true. Every day science advances and progresses and what today is one thing, tomorrow is other.

I prefer antropology. If you look white, you are white.

[Rethel]

Not true. Every day science advance and progresses and what today is one thing, tomorrow is other.

Did I say, that you should live like mammoth hunters?

I prefer antropology. If you look white, you are white.

And whn you go on the sun, you are not. And what?