Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: New discovery proves that New Guineans are more related to Neandertals than Europeans

  1. #1
    Anglo-Zionist Plutocrat Savant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    06-15-2012 @ 01:48 PM
    Location
    Montreal, QC/ Atlanta, GA
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Cro-Mag Powah!
    Ethnicity
    WASPy
    Ancestry
    Norman Overlords
    Country
    Quebec
    Region
    Georgia
    Taxonomy
    Anglo Norman
    Politics
    Libertarian Nationalism, Pan Occidentalism
    Religion
    Episcopal
    Gender
    Posts
    1,446
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default New discovery proves that New Guineans are more related to Neandertals than Europeans

    http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPl...68&m=132276868

    ^ link to audio version of story

    DNA taken from a pinkie bone at least 30,000 years old is hinting at the existence of a previously unknown population of ancient humans. It's just the latest example of how modern genetic techniques are transforming the world of anthropology.

    The pinkie bone in question was unearthed in 2008 from what's called the Denisova Cave.

    "The Denisova Cave is in southern Siberia in the Altai Mountains in central Asia," says David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard Medical School in Boston. "This bone is the bone of a 6- to 7-year-old girl."

    Reich and colleagues from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig were able to extract DNA from the pinkie bone and sequence all 3 billion letters of DNA that made up this girl's genome. This is the second ancient genome this team has unraveled. The first was the Neanderthal genome announced earlier this year.


    EnlargeDavid Reich, et al./Nature
    This tooth, which was also found in Denisova Cave, has a DNA structure similar to that of a finger bone. Its shape and physical structure are, however, very different from that of Neanderthals and modern humans, leading researchers to believe that the Denisovans are a distinct group.
    Closer To Neanderthals

    Reich says there were several remarkable things about the group of people this girl is from, a group he and his colleagues call Denisovans.

    "On the one hand it's a sister group to Neanderthals, which means that it's more closely related to Neanderthals on average than it is to modern humans," he says.

    As he reports in the journal Nature, the other remarkable finding was that Denisovans' genome was more closely related to humans currently living in New Guinea than it was to genomes of people in Europe or Asia.

    "What it means is that there was gene exchange between relatives of this Denisovan and the ancestors of New Guineans," says Reich.

    In other words, as they left Africa, modern humans must have passed through the realm of the Denisovans, and had sex with some of the locals, on their way to Melanesia. And if you look at a map, the route from Africa to New Guinea does not go through Siberia, suggesting that the Denisovans may have lived over a quite a large swath of the globe.

    Reich says for now, this pinkie bone is the only known Denisovan fossil. "I think the hunt should be on for more fossils and to understand the tools they used," he says.

    Related NPR Stories

    DNA Suggests Ancient Hunter Also Fought Baldness
    Researchers say this is the most complete reconstruction of ancient human DNA to date.
    SPECIAL SERIES: The Human Edge
    Sept. 6, 2010
    Food For Thought: Meat-Based Diet Made Us Smarter
    Aug. 2, 2010
    Transforming Anthropology

    Anthropologist John Hawks of the University of Wisconsin, Madison says DNA evidence is changing the way anthropologists work. "It's so much more than we knew from the fossil record. It's really like discovering something for the first time," he says. Hawks says genetic analysis will provide a much richer picture of life in the distant past.

    For example, a group in Spain published a paper this week analyzing the DNA from 12 Neanderthals found in a single cave. The analysis suggested the men were all brothers or cousins, whereas the women had come from different bands.

    "Looking at that one site, you've got this picture of the existence of a group and how they were related to each other," he says. "That's cool. That's the kind of stuff we have no access to in the archaeological record."

    http://www.npr.org/2010/12/23/132243...rs?sc=fb&cc=fp

  2. #2
    Novichok
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    British Isles
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Boer
    Ancestry
    Dutch, German, French Huguenot, British
    Country
    Great Britain
    Region
    Essex
    Y-DNA
    E-V13
    mtDNA
    H1b
    Taxonomy
    Norid
    Politics
    Godly
    Hero
    Jesus, the King of Kings
    Religion
    Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    60,964
    Blog Entries
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 44,956
    Given: 45,027

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    New discovery proves that New Guineans are more related to Neandertals than Europeans
    Not true. The Denisovans were closer to the Neanderthals than humans. What it means, is that New Guineans have some genes that are more related to Neanderthals than Europeans - since New Guineans are not pure Denisovans. They just carry a Denisovan gene, presumably among many other. Just as some Europeans carry Neanderthal genes.
    Help support Apricity by making a donation

  3. #3
    Anglo-Zionist Plutocrat Savant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last Online
    06-15-2012 @ 01:48 PM
    Location
    Montreal, QC/ Atlanta, GA
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Cro-Mag Powah!
    Ethnicity
    WASPy
    Ancestry
    Norman Overlords
    Country
    Quebec
    Region
    Georgia
    Taxonomy
    Anglo Norman
    Politics
    Libertarian Nationalism, Pan Occidentalism
    Religion
    Episcopal
    Gender
    Posts
    1,446
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7
    Given: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Yes, and the Dinesovans were closer to New Guineans than to Europeans. Hence- Neandertal
    Quote Originally Posted by Loki View Post
    Not true. The Denisovans were closer to the Neanderthals than humans. What it means, is that New Guineans have some genes that are more related to Neanderthals than Europeans - since New Guineans are not pure Denisovans. They just carry a Denisovan gene, presumably among many other. Just as some Europeans carry Neanderthal genes.

  4. #4
    Novichok
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    British Isles
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Boer
    Ancestry
    Dutch, German, French Huguenot, British
    Country
    Great Britain
    Region
    Essex
    Y-DNA
    E-V13
    mtDNA
    H1b
    Taxonomy
    Norid
    Politics
    Godly
    Hero
    Jesus, the King of Kings
    Religion
    Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    60,964
    Blog Entries
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 44,956
    Given: 45,027

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    I don't understand exactly what you mean by this.
    Quote Originally Posted by Savant View Post
    Yes, and the Dinesovans were closer to New Guineans than to Europeans. Hence- Neandertal
    Help support Apricity by making a donation

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. New study ’proves’ that we can see the future
    By Sol Invictus in forum Weird and Paranormal
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 09-11-2011, 06:01 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-15-2010, 10:49 PM
  3. Which is 'involuntary servitude', or most closely related to it
    By SwordoftheVistula in forum Law & Concepts
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-30-2009, 04:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •