The Partial IndoEuropean Origin Of Turkic People, Reality Cannot Be Ignored Any Longer

[Eridon]

I don't know if it is Celtic or Iranian, I only said Celtic because I recall reading from some source that their clothing resembled Celts in Europe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarim_mummies

It is increasingly obvious that the Turkics are the result of migrating Caucasoids who mixed with East Asians. Tocharians are obviously the original ancestors of Turk's but virtually no Turk alive today resembles their original ancestors since they are such a mixed group.





https://www.newdawnmagazine.com/arti...es-of-the-gobi They were obviously Celts who went through a different migration route during R1 expansion.

These Celts, like the Etuscans and other Neolithic peoples were Pyramid builders. The Greeks spoke highly of the Tocharians and they were the most Culturally advanced Celtic tribe in the Ancient world. Perhaps they learned of this knowledge from the Neolithic Oxus Civilization that the IndoIranians were influenced by, unknown but it is a likely possibility.

The Yuhezi. Their MTDNA is mostly East Asian.



The Pyramids. The Tarim Basin, the Silk Road, these are the people who built an extensive Civilization of settlements managing trade between Civilizations. Their expansion represents one of the most advanced Ancient people in history Rivaling the Egyptians, Greeks , Romans and Sumerians.

Turkics themselves emerged as a result of extensive mixing between Tocharians and East Asians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic...rand_Historian

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tocharians#Names

[LoLeL]

ButlerKing v2.0

Tocharians were not Celtic, Iranian, or whatever.

[Eridon]

ButlerKing v2.0

Tocharians were not Celtic, Iranian, or whatever.

That guys posts are full of pseudo nonsense and deluded idiocy, he compares Albino Indians to Europeans.......

My posts make more sense. You don't know enough about this anyway.

[LoLeL]

That guys posts are full of pseudo nonsense and deluded idiocy, he compares Albino Indians to Europeans.......

My posts make more sense. You don't know enough about this anyway.

Ethnicity: British

[TheForeigner]

Who denies that Turkics are part Indo-European? They obviously assimilated the Tocharians and the Iranians of Central Asia, among other peoples.

[Rethel]

Some ~1/3 of them is of IE provenance, frst kaganates were ruled by IEs, Iranians, and
even according to the legend, they are related. So, regardless, what and when did they
assimilated, they have a lot of traces to us. Even Ottomans were pure IEs, exept they
has to accept altaic language nearby (themselves prefering more IE version plus persian).
The title of sultans was also IE - Padishakh.

[Kelmendasi]

Those mummies are Tocharians which belong to their own IE family and arent Celtic or Iranic. Also Greeks and Celts aren’t Neolithic people as they are IE. Also Etruscans have no link to IE peoples

[Kaushika]

Eww

[Marmara]

I was arguing about this with other turkish member Böri. I acknowledge it but he refuses for some reason.

[Pahli]

I was arguing about this with other turkish member Böri. I acknowledge it but he refuses for some reason.

Some people cannot handle the truth because of nationalistic reasons. Although the same story applies to modern Iran, ruled by Iranic elites that gradually assimilated its population, so by genetics we are barely Indo-European / Iranic. I think Pamiri groups in Tajikistan are very Iranic though, even their clothing has a lot of resemblance to the andronovo culture.



I've seen similar clothing among Pashtuns and Kurds in Khorasan.

Kurds from Khorasan: