Mass immigration fuels poverty, says labour mp frank field.

[00smita]

A FORMER Labour minister who has been offered a post advising David Cameron yesterday warned that mass immigration was fuelling poverty.

Senior backbencher Frank Field, who is in talks with the Prime Minister about taking up a welfare advisory role, said unemployment was spreading because many new jobs were snapped up by migrants.

And he feared the open-door border policy operated by Labour would mean condemning more Britons to welfare dependency and poverty.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/...MP-Frank-Field

.

[Adalwolf]

The best solution is to just cancel all social welfare programs. Make the lazy immigrants work to try and survive like everyone else. it would instill a social-Darwinist type of society until nature balanced itself out again. Survival of the fittest.

[The Lawspeaker]

Well I have a better idea: kick the immigrants out and keep the welfare programs intact for the citizens. They shouldn't have to starve because of the immigrants and the fatcats. There is no work at the moment and some people can't work because of handicaps, old age or illness. Or because they are single parents.

Social Darwinism went out of fashion a long time because it creates social divisions and an unbalanced society.

[Adalwolf]

Which is the more realistic action plan, though?

[The Lawspeaker]

Which is the more realistic action plan, though?

A civic society based on a people's community. It has worked in Europe before the immigrants came but that's something a colonial doesn't know the slightest thing about.

I have to look at the 1950s when European countries were rebuilding themselves. The onset of the welfare state fuelled the confidence people had in themselves and in the economy. It pulled them closer together. "If something happens to me.. I will not be left out."

That went for the common man as much as for Queen herself.

[Peasant]

Some kind of social Darwinism for the immigrants would just lead to a rise in immigrant crime.

EDIT: And if the same was applied to everyone... replace immigrants with unfortunate/poor.

[Crossbow]

Some kind of social Darwinism for the immigrants would just lead to a rise in immigrant crime.

EDIT: And if the same was applied to everyone... replace immigrants with unfortunate/poor.

It would be Darwinism, without the adjective 'social'.

[Adalwolf]

''Kicking all the immigrants out'' is an absurd expectation because unless we experience some kind of revolution, this will never happen. Kicking in Darwinism might seem harsh and inconsiderate to some right now, but the end results would leave a stronger united people.

[The Lawspeaker]

Bullocks. We will have a completely fragmented and effed up society where people are even more selfish then they are today.. coupled with immigrants that will be even more mentally effed up or probably take over the place. Darwinism is a recipe for national suicide.

[Adalwolf]

coupled with immigrants that will be even more mentally effed up or probably take over the place.

So you have more faith in the immigrants strength than your own people? C'mon man, a defeatist mindset will never accomplish anything.

Darwinism is a recipe for national suicide.

More like this- 'Darwinism is a recipe for national revivalism'.