0
First of all: New York abortion rate review shows 39% of pregnancies terminated - National post-partisan | Examiner.com
He goes on to assert that it might be a lot of people going to New York to kill the fetus, but it seems unlikely to me that such impoverished persons could afford to travel from all over just to enter New York for an abortion. However, I'd like to add to his statistics regarding a racial breakdown (which is what made me post this in The Racial Tragedy rather than the America forum).ABC and CBS news set off an internet firestorm with reports that 39% of pregnancy outcomes in New York City terminate by abortion.
The Big Apple’s Health Department reported on over 210,000 pregnancies in 2010. Over 87,000 of those pregnancies ended in terminations.
At least no one can accuse the pro-choice community of not doing its part to end overcrowding in Manhattan.
Since race is sure to come up – as it always does in today's "post-racial" America – the ethnic breakdown was as follows:
- African American pregnancies ending in abortion: about 60%
- Latino pregnancies ending in abortion: about 40%.
- Asian and white pregnancies ending in abortion: about 20% for each group.
Secondly:
New York City is losing Blacks
Now, according to the Times article, Negroes make up less that 25% of New York City's population, but as recent statistics in the Post-Partisan Examiner article show, 60% of their pregnancies are terminated. Right now, there is no racial or eugenicist agenda among pro-abortion activists, at least not visibly, but the pro-life crowd have repeatedly attempted to smear their opponents with charges of a secret racial agenda to exterminate black people, since the founder of Planned Parenthood was in fact a dedicated eugenicist. The racial basis for her programme, however, stands on shaky ground.An accelerating exodus of American-born blacks, coupled with slight declines in birthrates and a slowing influx of Caribbean and African immigrants, have produced a decline in New York City's black population for the first time since the draft riots during the Civil War, according to preliminary census estimates.
An analysis of the latest figures, which show the city with 30,000 fewer black residents in 2004 than in 2000, also revealed stark contrasts in the migration patterns of blacks and whites.
While white New Yorkers are still more likely than blacks to leave the city, they are also more likely to relocate to the nearby suburbs (which is where half the whites move) or elsewhere in the Northeast, or to scatter to other cities and retirement communities across the country. Moreover, New York remains a magnet for whites from most other states.
I have taken the liberty of also finding information on the New York City Mexican population ("Mexican" here refers to all half-breeds from south of the border, not just from Mexico itself). Wikipedia claims that up to 36% of the population are foreign-born. This includes Asians and Africans as well as our target, so let's break it down more. According to the 2000 Census, 27% of the population is "Hispanic (any race)". 40% of all their pregnancies are terminated, as cited above. Asians and whites collectively constitute 55% of the city population, but only 20% of each abort.
The great question, of course, is what effect this is having on overall demography, and whether the trend is repeating itself elsewhere. I do not have these statistics. It seems to me that most Negroes seem to be moving back into the South, which has always struck me as a major problem. Carpet-baggers did no good for the south in the 19th century, they aren't going to do any good in the 21st either.
However, serious questions are begged by this information, and I decided they were worth posing to you all here, including European members, whose nations suffer from overcrowding by immigrants (especially Negroes), constituting a degenerate and criminal population similar to the foreigners and Negroes in America.
Can the American Negro and Mexican populations be brought into wider decline, or are they simply replaced with more Africans as their numbers decline? If the Negro declines in America, what sort of void will it create and can it benefit Euro-Americans?
Finally, the big question, are abortion campaigns aimed at impoverished populations a boon or a bane to European and American society? If they are a boon, should we be pursuing them more earnestly in the European Preservationist community?
I myself have long been anti-abortion because of the spiritual ramifications, but if we have the opportunity to bring the ever-expanding population of undesirables under control or even into decline through the use of this method, I have to wonder if it's not a good idea to endorse abortion.
Bookmarks