2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 23,148 Given: 18,117 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,489 Given: 13,022 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,489 Given: 13,022 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,295 Given: 26,310 |
There's no such country as "Myanmar". It's called Burma.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,187 Given: 3,170 |
What about the over 100,000 Christians that were forced to flee Burma? They get over looked by the Western media and are equally persecuted in Burma.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.trt...ion-318024/amp
There are definately racial undertones in the current expulsion of certain peoples from Burma. Something similar happened in Bhutan a few years ago, but with Nepali people.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,314 Given: 71 |
That's bullshit. Arakan was not even part of Burma in the past. You simply invaded and took it in 1785.
Burmese are fake Buddhist. You have kingdoms that invaded many neighbouring regions and you also have committed crimes against the Chin, Shan people who all told the same of your cruelty
You government is a dictatorship for the longest time in southeast asia and your monks are promote violence. Your history is full of invading other people's territory. Everything you do is against the teaching of Buddhism.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,314 Given: 71 |
The sample of those study are from Rakhine Burma and Burmese. The Burmese with less than 20% south asian are the Bamar dominant majority of Burma while the other with 18-35% are Rakhine.
The Mongoloid admixture in Bengali is too high 12-17%. Southern Bengali had been under the rule of the Rakhine dynasty for 300 years and received Mongoloid admixture. However other parts of Bengal are only 5% Mongoloid and in this study it's draws most of the study from Southern Bengali who are are around 13-15% Mongoloid
Here is the study of Burma.
Burmese being 5% South Asian and another 18% on average. The Thais and Cambodians here are surprisingly less than all the other study.
Last edited by ButlerKing; 08-13-2018 at 12:43 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,314 Given: 71 |
For some reason the Cambodians have low indian admixture in that study. In the other study Cambodians are around 17-24% Indian but yet here is only 10%. I have never seen Malaysians with 0% South Asian admixture but here in this study have it's 0% which is impossible. While for Burmese in the other studies they are only 10-15% South Asian.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,314 Given: 71 |
Burma has way too much South Asian admixture and Bengali too much on Mongoloid. Other study only shows they have 5-15%. Malaysian, Cambodian, Thais in every study I've seen shows they are only 76-85% Mongoloid yet on here is basically saying they are 90-100% Mongoloid which is crap. Other southeast Asian like Malay, Cambodians, Thais all look more south Asian influence in features than Burmese.
Bengali is more Mongoloid influenced in this study than in other who has only 5-10%. I think difference in regions produce different DNA.
Last edited by ButlerKing; 08-13-2018 at 12:53 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks