this discussion seems to be getting interesting. Bump!



this discussion seems to be getting interesting. Bump!



Yeah, and Germans have similar stories. That doesn't prove the anti-German narrative about WWII to be correct because you have "stories." Sheesh.
What documents, facts, statistics, and "evidences" pray tell? That's what I'm asking for basically and you have nothing. Surprise, surprise.
Because that's all you can do. But guess what? That, again, doesn't prove that the Nazis were doing what Jews, lying Ruskies, communists, and traitorous Westerners in general accuse them of doing overall. Though it's not difficult to prove that the Allies (particularly the raping Russians) were far from being the sanctimonious bunch they claim to be according to textbooks and History Channel documentaries.
Again, because you largely don't know what you're talking about like every other knee-jerk believer in Hollywood anti-Nazi propaganda.
That's terrible. But that's war. The Germans endured much suffering at the hands of Russian communists. Does that mean all Red Army officers are unworthy of being called "heroic"?
Everyone has sob stories to tell about war. Even Germans. Guess what? Your country was not only communist, but it also invaded the Baltic states, Poland (where my family is from!) on two occasions, Finland, and starved close to four million Ukranians while promulgating a strategy for world domination far beyond anything the Nazis said they wished to do. From this, you don't expect Germans to be a little bit trigger itchy when taking into account not only the Soviet Union's hostile posturing, but also, the Western Allies' hostile posturing? Of course, the two Allied sides (England and the U.S./ Soviet Union) become bedfellows in bringing about utter chaos and misery not only to the German people, but to Western Europe as a whole. And Germany saw this coming in advance is faulted for acting on what it saw.
I find it more remarkable that Germans don't hate Russians, honestly, despite the sanctimonious tone you display.
Well, you're "judging" Hess whom you seem to know little about.
Even if I were to accept the Holocaust nonsense (which is largely a myth), the numbers of people put through sheer terror and misery at the hands of your country by far outweighs anything the Germans did.
Nor do I want you to. I just wanted you to rationally support your point of view which you're not doing. It's just an emotion-filled response void of any reason.
Well, if questioning your lack of knowledge on a subject you demonstrate little knowledge about is insolent, then label me "guilty" as charged.
As you should.
Well, that's unfortunate. But that also has absolutely nothing to do with our little exchange here. The fact that you even bring up such a red herring illustrates perfectly how emotionally charged your response is as opposed to being based on any sort of reason.
I'm not dishonoring anyone, here. You're attempting to dishonor someone without any clear cause or evidence to do so and I'm merely defending him.
Why should they? Are you a Jew or some dirty communist or something?
Take it up with them. Not me.
Take it up with him. Not me. This nonsense has nothing to do with the content in your post I responded to. And for the record, how many movies are out there where we root for Nazis to get killed for being Nazis versus Ruskies getting killed for being communists? Just off the top of my head, Inglorious Basterds and the new X-Men movie both showed innocent Nazis being brutalized savagely. The audience is supposed to cheer this and get a sick orgiastic sense of pleasure from it. I have never seen such treatment in the media of your countrymen.
Take it up with the person in question. Are you here to argue points relevant to the topic with me or just bitch incessantly about some other guy (whom I have no control over) and what he said about Russians and whatnot?
Except that Stalin actually recorded his atrocities. They are easily veriable. Many (and most) of the crimes that Nazis are accused of committing by the mainstream Zionist media have never been verified and are dubious by applying simple logic which you seem to not understand.
They probably largely were. They were probably better than most soldiers out there, period. Sorry that hurts your feelings. But because you go on about how such an acknowledgement is "the last straw," doesn't mean that what they're saying may not be true.
Well, they did do those kind things in some areas. That's just a fact about the nobility of some German troops whether it offends your delicate sensibilities or not. Just like not every Russian soldier raped every German woman they could get their hands on. Some even tried to stop such rapes. Should acknowledging that offend Germans? By your logic, if a Russian soldier is portrayed positively, I should be outraged as a German sympathizer.
Seriously...what the fuck are you talking about?
Well, good for you. Again, nothing to do with our discussion. Just exposition I didn't need to hear. I have relatives that fought on the Western front. You don't see me going on about it when having an academic discussion about a historical figure or event.
Not at all. All I have gathered is that you feel bad when people view Nazis positively and say nasty things about your country. Well, too bad.
Well, of course. That doesn't mean both sides have just as many guilty parties, though. You just want it to be a wash so you can go on not having your delicate sensibilities hurt. Again, too bad.
Cry me a river! This point you bitch about on a thread dedicated to Rudolf Hess (who was a good man)? It's not like I'm on some "Russian appreciation thread" trolling on about how one of their more courageous figureheads shouldn't be considered a hero. That would make me like you.
Well, don't accept it. But all you're doing here is admitting that you can't be objective. If you weren't so self-absorbed about your own country, you'd understand that my position has an American has serious ramifications for how I view my own country's actions during WWII. That doesn't stop me from trying to be honest about the facts of the conflict. You can't get past the "me Russian/Russians good" phase. You strike me as the type of person that, were you an American, you wouldn't be able to admit that dropping nuclear bombs on Japan was immoral because "Japan did bad stuff too."
No, of course not. Some of them you even hate without demonstrating any knowledge that you understand them (such as Hess).
By that logic, ethics goes out the window. Even as a strong nationalist myself, that's throwing the baby out with the bathwater. If my country does something immoral, I will not support the specific action itself just because I'm an American.
Nah, you just decided to troll a thread that was dedicated to him.
In what way? Do you even know anything about the man other than the fact that he was a Nazi?
I don't care about feelings that are unfounded and not based on any reason, but rather, an ignorant historical perspective.
Last edited by Debaser11; 06-07-2011 at 04:52 AM.
"For it is by no means the case that only those who believe in God could possibly have a vested interest in the question of His existence."
--Edward Feser
"Our civilization has had many religions and many dispensations of thought. But one of the things that we have forgotten is that open-mindedness to the future and respect for evidence does mean wooliness and an absence of certitude in what we are."
--Jonathan Bowden


In the context decent means just a biography that goes beyond the basics of his date and place of birth
There isn't a group of denial of Hess having been a pupil of Haushofer yet (maybe you want to start one)
Have you bother researching the theories of Karl Haushofer before typying this piece?
I gave you the keys to the question day ago. Have you done any reading since then, or you've been too busy on internet forums?It's a popular myth, furthered by the American "History Channel" and similar sources of WTC-myths, amateur DaVinci Code imitators, and generally paranoid unemployed (unemployable?) individuals who spend a lot of time in front of the television.
Friedrich Ratzel. Not AmericanThe "Lebensraum" doctrine is in no wise unique to the National Socialists; indeed, it was Americans who first suggested the idea and
Speaking of conspiranoicsit made its circulation in Germany before National Socialism was a word in anyone's vocabulary.
I'm out of here



Giving you the benefit of the doubt about this Haushofer appeal, do you apply the guilty by association standard to everyone? (Clearly not.) Do you also believe in one inheriting the sins of the father?
How about we apply this same standard of condemnation to the Jews, for example?
"For it is by no means the case that only those who believe in God could possibly have a vested interest in the question of His existence."
--Edward Feser
"Our civilization has had many religions and many dispensations of thought. But one of the things that we have forgotten is that open-mindedness to the future and respect for evidence does mean wooliness and an absence of certitude in what we are."
--Jonathan Bowden



There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Deutschland
Bookmarks