Post MDLP K23b East Eurasian Admixture

[Thambi]

...

[Lemgrant]

Amerindian 1.04 Pct
Ancestral_Altaic 2.92 Pct
South_Central_Asian -
Arctic 0.58 Pct
South_Indian 1.64 Pct
Australoid -
Austronesian 0.60 Pct
Caucasian 28.02 Pct
Archaic_Human -
East_African -
East_Siberian 1.54 Pct
European_Early_Farmers 13.81 Pct
Khoisan -
Melano_Polynesian 0.29 Pct
Archaic_African -
Near_East 0.46 Pct
North_African -
Paleo_Siberian -
African_Pygmy 0.07 Pct
South_East_Asian -
Subsaharian -
Tungus-Altaic -
European_Hunters_Gatherers 49.04 Pct
*****************

6.68

[Ritz06]

Amerindian -
Ancestral_Altaic 4.14
Arctic - 1.68
East_Siberian -
Paleo_Siberian -
Austronesian - 1.01
South_East_Asian 2.00
Tungus-Altaic - 0.08

= 9.92

With South_Central_Asian - 14.28

= 24.2

[Egyvalaki]

1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 33.53
2 Caucasian 26.41
3 European_Early_Farmers 24.12
4 South_Central_Asian 5.08
5 Ancestral_Altaic 4.04
6 Near_East 2.75
7 Melano_Polynesian 1.46
8 North_African 0.9
9 East_African 0.73
10 South_Indian 0.64
11 Amerindian 0.34

[Rgvgjhvv]

MyHeritage raw data:

Amerindian -
Arctic -
East_Siberian 0.17
Paleo_Siberian -
South_East_Asian -
Tungus-Altaic 0.18
Austronesian -
Ancestral_Altaic 1.27
South_Central_Asian 6.63

----------

= 8.25

AncestryDNA raw data:

Amerindian 0.32 Pct
Arctic -
East_Siberian -
Paleo_Siberian -
South_East_Asian -
Tungus-Altaic -
Austronesian -
Ancestral_Altaic 1.39 Pct
South_Central_Asian 6.93 Pc

----------

= 8.64

T00R4NID G0D

[Cumansky]

55.7% Balt ( ) + 44.3% Serb_Serbia ( ) @ 2.23

1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 49.04
2 Caucasian 28.56
3 European_Early_Farmers 11.91
4 Ancestral_Altaic 4.03-
5 Near_East 1.55
6 South_Central_Asian 1.17-
7 South_Indian 1
8 Amerindian 0.98-
9 Khoisan 0.43
10 East_Siberian 0.31-
11 Subsaharian 0.3
12 East_African 0.26
13 Melano_Polynesian 0.17-
14 African_Pygmy 0.12
15 Archaic_African 0.07
16 Archaic_Human 0.05
17 South_East_Asian 0.04-

= 6.68

[Stefanos.tasidis]

south central asian definitely is not mongoloid lol. i think it is really high for caucasian(caucasus) populations.

[oszkar07]

# Population Percent
1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 38.79
2 Caucasian 26.26
3 European_Early_Farmers 23.31
4 South_Central_Asian 3.71
5 Ancestral_Altaic 3.15
6 Near_East 2.03
7 Melano_Polynesian 1.04
8 Paleo_Siberian 0.82
9 North_African 0.49
10 Austronesian 0.27
11 East_Siberian 0.14

= 8.09


# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 54.8% Croat ( ) + 45.2% British ( ) @ 1.38
2 59.4% Serb_Serbia ( ) + 40.6% Norwegian_West ( )@ 1.4
3 54.1% Montenegrian ( )+ 45.9%Norwegian_West ( ) @ 1.42
4 53.9% Croat ( ) + 46.1% CEU ( ) @ 1.45
5 59.1% Belgian ( ) + 40.9% Croat ( ) @ 1.48
6 50.6% Norwegian_West ( ) + 49.4%Macedonian ( ) @ 1.51
7 61.6% Belgian ( ) + 38.4% Croat_BH ( ) @ 1.52
8 54.7% Croat ( ) + 45.3% Welsh ( ) @ 1.54
9 60.1% Belgian ( ) + 39.9% Bosnian ( ) @ 1.57
10 59.3% Belgian ( ) + 40.7% Serb_BH ( ) @ 1.58

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Croat_BH_ +50% English_Cornwall_GBR_ @ 1.428073


does anyone know what sample is used for the south central asian on this ?

[Norka]

Ancestral_Altaic 7.21
South_Central_Asian 3.82
Austronesian 0.15
East_Siberian 5.07
Paleo_Siberian 1.91
Tungus-Altaic 2.02
South_East_Asian -
Arctic -
Amerindian -

Overall 20.18

[Kaspias]

south central asian definitely is not mongoloid lol. i think it is really high for caucasian(caucasus) populations.

Ok. Who claimed it is mongolic?

# Population Percent
1 European_Hunters_Gatherers 38.79
2 Caucasian 26.26
3 European_Early_Farmers 23.31
4 South_Central_Asian 3.71
5 Ancestral_Altaic 3.15
6 Near_East 2.03
7 Melano_Polynesian 1.04
8 Paleo_Siberian 0.82
9 North_African 0.49
10 Austronesian 0.27
11 East_Siberian 0.14

= 8.09


# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 54.8% Croat ( ) + 45.2% British ( ) @ 1.38
2 59.4% Serb_Serbia ( ) + 40.6% Norwegian_West ( )@ 1.4
3 54.1% Montenegrian ( )+ 45.9%Norwegian_West ( ) @ 1.42
4 53.9% Croat ( ) + 46.1% CEU ( ) @ 1.45
5 59.1% Belgian ( ) + 40.9% Croat ( ) @ 1.48
6 50.6% Norwegian_West ( ) + 49.4%Macedonian ( ) @ 1.51
7 61.6% Belgian ( ) + 38.4% Croat_BH ( ) @ 1.52
8 54.7% Croat ( ) + 45.3% Welsh ( ) @ 1.54
9 60.1% Belgian ( ) + 39.9% Bosnian ( ) @ 1.57
10 59.3% Belgian ( ) + 40.7% Serb_BH ( ) @ 1.58

Using 2 populations approximation:
1 50% Croat_BH_ +50% English_Cornwall_GBR_ @ 1.428073


does anyone know what sample is used for the south central asian on this ?

I don't know it's exact reference point. South Central Asia isn't really an "official" term like South Asia or Central Asia and usually refers to everything between Central Asia and Balochistan pretty much. Gedrosian/Baloch in admixture calculators like Eurogenes K36 (along with all the HGDP Pakistan populations) is labeled "South Central" Asian.

It's basically that part of South and Central Asia (http://www.state.gov/p/sca/ci/) which is between Central Asia (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/...8/Central-Asia) and the Indian subcontinent (since this entire area is usually labeled South Asia (https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat...egion_sas.html), but there are two components in this region, so the one to the west (usually Balochistan) is termed South Central Asian as the Indian one gets "South Asian").

The reason why added it in this thread, most of Turks carry high amount of SCA so it is a good indicator, just like ancestral altaic.