1. From 2008[17] Klyosov is also known as the author of what he calls "DNA genealogy" and "new science", aimed to synthesize biology, anthropology, archaeology and linguistics and to implement methods of chemical kinetics in genetics.[18][19] Klyosov described his "DNA genealogy" as a "patriotic science" and between 2010 and 2016 published 10 books in this field.[20] In some of his writings Klyosov tried to refute the Out of Africa hypothesis and proposed his alternative Into Africa theory[21] with "outlandish claims" that the human species originated in Northern Russia.[18][20] According to scientists from various fields, "DNA genealogy" is pseudoscience,[22] and they have characterized it as "DNA demagoguery”.[18][23]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatole_Klyosov
Xaxaxa
2. All haplogroups have the same ultimate origin in Africa, so kind of irrelevant. Modern Europe comes from ancient era and forward, wtf do I care which caveman reached what first as it has zero connection to modern identities. The convo of which happened to be first or remained the longest where is irrelevant, as it is which developed with an ethnogenesis that matters. I2a-Din is what is associated with Slavic migrations to the balkans, not I in total. Add to that, there seems to be older Y-DNA haplogroups in Europe, although not as prevelant:
"From a purely patrilineal, Y-chromosome perspective, it is possible that the old haplogroups C, F and/or E may be those with the oldest presence in Europe. They have been found in some very old human remains in Europe. However, other haplogroup are far more common among living European males.
Haplogroup I (M170), which is now relatively common and widespread within Europe, may represent a Palaeolithic marker – its age has been estimated at ~ 22,000 BP. While it is now concentrated in Europe, it probably arose in a male from the Middle East or Caucasus, or their near descendants, c. 20–25,000 years BP, when it diverged from its immediate ancestor, haplogroup IJ. At about this time, an Upper Palaeolithic culture also appeared, known as the Gravettian.[26]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_history_of_Europe
This is a dumb discussion to have because 1. you don't understand the difference between ethnogenesis and haplogroup, 2. Neither of us works on this topic professionaly so I'm basically discussing with someone that gets all his info from tabloids like 99% of Serbs, and it's a waste of time for both.
3. 40-45% having it means 55-60% not having it.
4. Bulgarians are also Serbs but not I2a-Din? Just say it, everyone's a Serb. Tabloids have fried your brain.
I like how you keep just mentioning I, as if I'm supposed to draw connections between old Germanic and British people, and Serbian migrations to the balkans. Yeah buddy, you're all the same group. All of you Serbs, I assume.
5. Your preference is irrelevant, you're probably close to suicide due to frustration.
Srbija
Originally Posted by Sturmgewehr
Yes Serbs have more than 20% EV13 but since you like eating Cherries and are walking with the Cherry basket around then no problem as you said, the matter of fact is that Serbs have quite significant amount of Africanoid E1b1 and Arabid J2 so in the end your efforts are futile, you need to come and shake hands with your Shiptar brothers because no one in Poland or Eastern Europe considers you a brother, by the way in genetic distance you are Closer to a Shiptar than to a Ukrainian or Russian.
Reply With Quote
.
Bookmarks