Indo-Europeans and their neighbors.

[Blondie]

Not scandinavian, scandinavians until late middle ages, were on par with africans and look like pigs.
Jesus was indeed platinum blonde haired & deep blue eyed.
- Revelation 1:14

Fake, Jesus was middle eastern not platinum blonde blue eyed

"The New Testament gives no description of the physical appearance of Jesus before his death—it is generally indifferent to racial appearances and does not refer to the features of the people it mentions.[349][350][351] Jesus probably looked like a typical Jew of his time and according to some scholars was likely to have had a sinewy appearance due to his ascetic and itinerant lifestyle.[352]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus#...city_of_events

"By the Middle Ages, a number of documents, generally of unknown or questionable origin, had been composed and were circulating with details of the appearance of Jesus. Now these documents are mostly considered forgeries.[4][5][6]
As a Jew in 1st century Judea, Jesus probably looked like a typical Judean man of his time. Research on ancient skeletons in Israel suggests that Judeans of the time were biologically closer to Iraqi Jews than any other contemporary population, and thus in terms of physical appearance the average Judean of the time would have likely had dark brown to black hair, olive skin, and brown eyes. Judean men of the time period were on average about 5 feet 5 inches (1.65 m) in height. Scholars have also suggested that it is likely Jesus had short hair and a trim beard, in accordance with Jewish practices of the time. The earliest depictions of Jesus from the Roman catacombs depict him as free of facial hair.

Historians have speculated over how Jesus' ascetic and itinerant lifestyle and work as a carpenter, with the manual labor and exposure to the elements that entailed, affected his appearance. It has been suggested that Jesus likely had a sinewy appearance. He may have had weathered and callused skin and a leathery face, and looked older than he really was. It has even been suggested that due to the high risk of injury of the job, he may have had some type of disfigurement.[11][12][13][14][15]

The Book of Revelation includes John's vision of the Son of Man: "...and His feet were like unto burnt brass, His head and His hairs were white like wool, as white as snow;" [other translations: "burnished bronze"], as if they burned in a furnace..." in a vision (1:13–16), but this vision is usually considered to refer to Jesus in heavenly form, not necessarily his appearance during his earthly life.[21][22]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_a...rance_of_Jesus

[IncelSlayer]

^^^^^

LMFAO using Wikipedia as a source, what is this, highschool?

As a Jew in 1st century Judea, Jesus probably looked like a typical Judean man of his time. Research on ancient skeletons in Israel suggests that Judeans of the time were biologically closer to Iraqi Jews than any other contemporary population, and thus in terms of physical appearance the average Judean of the time would have likely had dark brown to black hair, olive skin, and brown eyes. Judean men of the time period were on average about 5 feet 5 inches (1.65 m) in height. Scholars have also suggested that it is likely Jesus had short hair and a trim beard, in accordance with Jewish practices of the time. The earliest depictions of Jesus from the Roman catacombs depict him as free of facial hair.

Just lol @ you. this is just the skeletal analysis of a average sandnigger back then, its on par with that fake israeli made CGI that keeps resurfacing on the internet
Nordic Jesus is Pagans biggest nightmare.Cease your lies already.

[Rethel]

2. There is no proof for the Botai Culture - turkic connection. The first one was in West Siberia, Proto-turks originated from Mongolia:

Botai was N and R. So I think, originally were N. Then R came and made use of local horses.
R obviously were Indoeuropeans from the West. Who were N hard to say, but I quess could
be some early Ugrofinchurians. Until it will be not sure, what sens to make with the possible
Uralo-Alataic thing and N, until we cant be certain. But one we can be certain: if there was
R1b and there was horse domestication, then it has to be R-people who brought this skill to
the locals, not otherwise. And this finally proves that horse domestication is IE achievment.

[Harkonnen]

Botai was N and R. So I think, originally were N. Then R came and made use of local horses.
R obviously were Indoeuropeans from the West. Who were N hard to say, but I quess could
be some early Ugrofinchurians. Until it will be not sure, what sens to make with the possible
Uralo-Alataic thing and N, until we cant be certain. But one we can be certain: if there was
R1b, and there was horse domestication, then it has to be R-people who brought this skill to
the locals, not otherwise. And this finally proves that horse domestication is IE achievment.

Botai horse dna has not been found on IE horses, so it is pretty obvious Botai has nothing to do with IE. On the other hand, Botai horse dna has been found in Finland and Estonia.

[Bender1999]

Botai horse dna has not been found on IE horses, so it is pretty obvious Botai has nothing to do with IE. On the other hand, Botai horse dna has been found in Finland and Estonia.

Botai culture was not IE if we consider their dna. Genetically they resemble more to Finno-Ugrics.

[Rethel]

Botai horse dna has not been found on IE horses, so it is pretty obvious Botai has nothing to do with IE. On the other hand, Botai horse dna has been found in Finland and Estonia.

I didn't say, that Botai horses were from the west, did I? I said that people were. People had skills, and could used them everywhere. When they learned how to use horses, then when they go to another place, they used local horses as well. If you learnd how to use finnish bicycles, then will you your whole life be able to use only them, taking them with yourself whereever you go, so when you will live in Australia, you won't be able to drive australian bicycles? It would be total nonsense. The same is in the case of horses. If you can herd or ride ukrainian wild horses, then you also will be able to do the same in new place of living to kazakh wild horses who live nearby your village in the forest.

And btw, area of Finland and Estonia was settled first by Indoeuropeans, so, the dna of these horses could be a remain of such, as northern Ugrofinians known from history did not use to use horses, but were reindeer pastoralists until quite recent times, also in Finland.

[Harkonnen]

I didn't say, that Botai horses were from the west, did I? I said that people were. People had skills, and could used them everywhere. When they learned how to use horses, then when they go to another place, they used local horses as well. If you learnd how to use finnish bicycles, then will you your whole life be able to use only them, taking them with yourself whereever you go, so when you will live in Australia, you won't be able to drive australian bicycles? It would be total nonsense. The same is in the case of horses. If you can herd or ride ukrainian wild horses, then you also will be able to do the same in new place of living to kazakh wild horses who live nearby your village in the forest.

And btw, area of Finland and Estonia was settled first by Indoeuropeans, so, the dna of these horses could be a remain of such, as northern Ugrofinians known from history did not use to use horses, but were reindeer pastoralists until quite recent times, also in Finland.

LISTEN DUMFUCK POLAK do not start to annoy me with your fucking stupidity. You have narrow skull, and small brain. FU have broadskull and large brain; therefor I am right, you are wrong. It is as I say, now go back to eat your gabbage. By the way, your y-dna has mongoloid origin.

[Rethel]

your y-dna has mongoloid origin.

Can have even aboriginal, who cares, only you.

[Harkonnen]

Can have even aboriginal, who cares, only you.

I only notice my y-dna when I try to eat cabbage, as it does not taste that good.