6
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,508 Given: 1,329 |
How does this fit in with the fact that CM were huge? I would have thought that would have prevented such a clear correlation as this
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,508 Given: 1,329 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
What is interesting is that Ukraine has a high Steppe % and a high I-M170 %, but still manages to be rather short.
This is due to malnutrition and poverty. They need to accept Polish rules, we will feed them and they will grow tall.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,508 Given: 1,329 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 24,186 Given: 16,907 |
What this graphic proves is that Steppe Ancestry has little to nothing to do with your height.
YDNA: R1b-L21 > DF13 > S1051 > FGC17906 > FGC17907 > FGC17866
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,875 Given: 2,197 |
Interesting, but why the steppe ancestry didn't increase the height in Asia?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 7,331 Given: 2,699 |
Yes, there's a correlation and it was already shown by multiple peer-reviewed studies. After mixing with early farmers and the consequent adoption of a sedentary lifestyle, the 'genetic height' of Europeans decreased significantly but, during the Bronze Age, corresponding with the Steppe introgression and the emergence of Indo-European haplogroups, at least in Western Europe, there was a significant subsequent increase and this was constated in Portugal and Ireland.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks