2
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,720 Given: 1,142 |
Picture
Thumbs Up |
Received: 433 Given: 1,048 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 433 Given: 1,048 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,032 Given: 1,214 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 433 Given: 1,048 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 250 Given: 32 |
If that’s true then why did you insist on her autosomal while stating haplogroup doesn’t mean nothing? Every company gives you different autosomal results
Genetics is haplogroup. If you’re a South Korean Man and marry a Russian women and your kids marry a Russian women, are they descendants of South Koreans or Russians? They would have your 90% threshold needed to be of that ethnicity but your thinking is flawed, you take paternally your ethnicity.Haplogroup H and its subtypes are the only native european mtdna haplogroups. T1 is middle eastern, and connected to iranic indo-europeans.
And you are european if you have predominantly european autosomal genetic (90%+), looking doesn't matter.
If you want to take genetics instead of looks, then you need to take the most important which is haplogroup which archeologists use not autosomal which is a tool made for people to entertain themselves.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,314 Given: 1,402 |
You are Kurdish and Arab. A North Iraqi. With a little bit of European on your mother's side. MTDNA is only the mother's mother's mother's mother's mother infinity. It can be thousands of years old. Your Arab mother's mother's mother's et cetera was probably a Western European woman that was kidnapped by the Barbary pirates or Ottomans and sold into slavery to Arabs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_slave_trade
Spoiler!
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10,019 Given: 12,249 |
This is a myth.
Every company gives you the same autosomal result, the difference is how those companies label the components.
People who tested with multiple companies will confirm this to you. If you do both 23andme and Myheritage, upload the raw data to gedmatch you will see the results from the two companies are like 99% the same after converting them to gedmatch.
Autosomal dna shows who you are, haplogroup show who your great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather was.Genetics is haplogroup. If you’re a South Korean Man ankorean half Russian persion wouldn't be seen as Russian, but he wouldn't be accepted in Korea as Korean either (despite your haplogroup-ideas).
d marry a Russian women and your kids marry a Russian women, are they descendants of South Koreans or Russians? They would have your 90% threshold needed to be of that ethnicity but your thinking is flawed, you take paternally your ethnicity.
A person with Korean father and Russian mother won't be seen as Russian, but he wouldn't be accepted in Korea as Korean either. So what's the point?
Autosomal DNA tends to correlate with looks. In many cases you can look at a person and guess how close genetically he is to you. An haplogroup does not affect a person's appearance like a-DNA does. In USA cities people create their ethnic hoods based on autosomal dna. You think a black person who has R or I haplogroup will want to live in a white hood instead of a black one because of his HG?If you want to take genetics instead of looks, then you need to take the most important which is haplogroup which archeologists use not autosomal which is a tool made for people to entertain themselves.
People want to live in neighborhoods where people are autosomally similar to them.
Why don't they self-segregate based on HGs, if HG is so important? https://s3.amazonaws.com/wbez-cdn/le...rankin-map.jpg
Archeology is just one branch of science. Other branches of science do care about autosomal and I'm sure even archeologists care about autosomal, but the technology for autosomal dna was not available until recent years.
Last edited by Universe; 12-02-2023 at 05:23 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks