0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 670 Given: 688 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 670 Given: 688 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,263 Given: 5,005 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 670 Given: 688 |
Hmm. What do you propose is responsible for why South-East Euro-Neolithic samples were so far south? Including some LBA/LIA Balkan samples. I mean my pull is slightly south-west towards Sardinians, my father as well. In a lot of nmonte runs, and even geneplaza calcs show a slight Sardinian input. Including wegene. Which I assumed was Neolithic and not actually Sardinian in any recent sense. Figured that explained the south shift.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,263 Given: 5,005 |
Some stronger Caucasian/West Asian affinity, you can see it better on a plot that contains them. If I'm not mistaken Balkan IA had that sort of pull aswell, it must be relatively old in the Balkans
https://i.postimg.cc/yBqByXbQ/west-eurasian-pca-g25.png
Thumbs Up |
Received: 670 Given: 688 |
Ahh I see. That makes sense because I get close with some of these samples, which is probably explained by the shift/admixture. I noticed in K36 me and my father have higher than most "Italian"(32 for me and 35 for my father) or Central Med as some label it(not as much as Sardinians), and some of the ancient samples had scores of 45-65 "Italian". So it is probably preserved admixture from isolation?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks