There are many distractions in our society for people of all ages. Not to mention, as I said, the continuous partying. The problem is that if there is an economic decline, the bottom will fall out of women's occupations. Women are mostly in the service jobs - which will be the first to go in any serious economic collapse.They are being emancipated to a childless life of misery-laden old age and bitterness.
If this happens, then many career women will be left with next to nothing...
Originally Posted by Curtis24
The West has another issue. The spoiled-brat-university-girl who is 22-25 with a degree and has never worked a 30+ hours a week job in her life.
There are millions of these. They've never really worked, are complete superficial socialites, have never worked a 40 hour job, and expect a guy working 40+ hours a week to want to marry them. They are fools. They hookup with men with large incomes who are older and do not realize they are being used. That guy isn't going to marry a superficial flake who's never worked in her life and has just spent the last 25 years going to classes on her parents dime and downloading hip-hop crap on her iPod. They spend 25-30 hooking up with guys making 75k+ and then wonder at 30 why they are single. It is hilarious. Meanwhile the men their age have all married by 30 with working-class 20-25 year old women who are having kids with them.
So ironically it is the men who win in this whole scenario. Men can wait. Men can spend 20-35 hooking up and fucking deluded 22-30 year old feminized women then when we want kids we can go to the value-oriented 20-25 year old teachers and working class women for kids and a family. Women cannot do this. Our seed remains fertile for a long time past 30, this is the function of our existence. Women are essentially done by 30 and by 40 are officially done in respect to children statistically speaking.
Yeah. You really need to read Roissy and the rest of the "manosphere". I don't agree with everything they say(it does devolve into outright misogyny), but they really do outline well how the invention of the pill and promiscuity is changing society.
http://roissy.wordpress.com/2009/06/...at-the-future/recurring theme here, and one that has gone wholly underappreciated by our elites on the Left and the Right, is how insidiously the culture and the sexual market have changed since the advent of the Four Sirens of the Sexual Apocalypse. As a helpful reminder, here are the four sirens I’m talking about:
1.Effective and widely available contraceptives (the Pill, condom, and the de facto contraceptive abortion).
2.Easy peasy no-fault divorce.
3.Women’s economic independence (hurtling towards women’s economic advantage if the college enrollment ratio is any indication).
4.Rigged feminist-inspired laws that have caused a disincentivizing of marriage for men and an incentivizing of divorce for women.
As I have written, these changes are slowly, but powerfully, tectonically shifting the courtship playing field. The big winners are alpha males and the big losers are beta males. Alpha females continue to do well because their beauty is so rare that they can successfully leverage their mating capital even when market conditions turn unfavorable. Beta females lose their long term advantage under the new dispensation at the gain of an ephemeral, deceptively alluring short term advantage. The modern PUA, an amalgam of the wisdom of old-fashioned rakes and the science of new-fangled evolutionary psychology, is one outgrowth of this massive and heretofore misapprehended trend.
We’ve had 40 years of this informally polygamous system killing us softly, and the results can be seen directly in delayed age of first marriage, rising divorce rates, decreasing fertility, and harem volunteerism, and indirectly through the coarsening and bastardization of American sensibility and governmental policy (e.g., Title IX, multicult suicide pact, AA, open borders, the ascendence of the therapy culture, and just about every assinine court decision since).
Naturally, changes on this scale don’t happen overnight. There was a store of good will and optimistic future time orientation bequeathed us by our beta male forebears — the men of the 19th and 20th centuries who built America into the hyperpower that made France shit its knickers — that will take generations to dissolve into the watery gruel of transnationalist solipsistic hedonism. We may even witness brief moments of cultural comeback, but the overall trend is unmistakeable. We are going the way of Rome.
A few months ago I had an email exchange with Randall Parker who writes two blogs I enjoy – Parapundit and Futurepundit. I wondered aloud what Greg Cochran — co-author of a PC shibboleth-smashing book about how human evolution has sped up in the last 10,000 years (and judging by his online persona a royal prick (my kind of guy) held in high esteem by his fellow genomic scientists) — anticipated the future shape of human evolution would take given the sexual marketplace changes I’ve written about on my blog. Specifically, I wanted to know if the Four Sirens would speed up human evolution even faster than the dawn of agriculture. This was Parker’s and Cochran’s reply (via R. Parker):
Contraception is a selective pressure for the desire to make babies and for less planning. Women who want to make babies won’t use the pill. Women who can’t plan for dinner won’t plan for getting a doctor’s appointment for a contraceptive prescription. I’ve written posts about this on FuturePundit. An Australian twins study found that Catholicism and fewer years of education are both positively correlated with fertility (no surprise on either score).
I asked Greg and Henry about this. Greg says in theory one can calculate the speed at which higher fertility will be selected for. But Henry says there’s not good data on the heritability of fertility.
As for other selective pressures: Greg has speculated that people will become more loyal to family. So the world will become more like the Middle East. Not good.
Greg also sees a biological eugenic arms race on the horizon.
http://www.isteve.com/Thatcher-Speech-Text.htm
Unencumbered by post-Christian ethics, the Chinese government recently passed a pre-1945-style eugenics law calling for the sterilization of “morons.” The ruthlessness of this law portends that if China implements genetic enhancements while the multiculturalist West either bans them or pursues a politically correct reengineering of human nature, the inevitable result within a few generations would be Chinese economic, and thus military, global hegemony. As the weapons scientist and evolutionary theorist Gregory Cochran pointed out, “We cannot opt out of this biological arms race any more than we could opt out of the nuclear arms race.” Therefore, those serious about either preventing or decreeing genetic engineering should start planning a preemptive nuclear strike on China, and soon.
Time to speculate about the future. In sum, we will have more people with lower future time orientation (i.e., the temperament to save for a rainy day and delay gratification for greater future gain), more impulsiveness (great for knocking up broads, not so great for building and sustaining first world levels of civilization), and more distrust of societal institutions in favor of tighter familial bonds (great for aspiring warlords and corrupt kleptocrats, not so great for maintaining a loyal national military or respect for the law or a basic sense of fairness).
In possibly what will turn out to be the juiciest irony in all of human history, feminism and its co-ideologies of deceit may usher in an America that looks more like a patriarchal Middle Eastern caliphate of their worst nightmares. The realization of the matricentric utopia that feminism has been clamoring for these last few generations will undo the very foundation upon which the rancid ideology was able to prop itself.
Human nature does not offer us a bottomless chest of treasure. Few are exempt from trade-offs, and no society can have everything its heart desires. To restore American greatness and comity of its people, feminism and its cousin -isms will have to be rolled back. This will mean women will sacrifice their earning power and some career freedom. The alternative is what we have now — economically independent women, freed from shame and the restrictions of their biology by the pill and abortion, following their vaginas straight into soft polygamy, state-supported single motherhood, and grossly unjust payday divorce settlements.
The sad truth is if you're a guy under 25 you can't even find a university girl who wants a relationship on average who isn't a gargoyle. They all just want to be single and hookup OR attempt to have a relationship with some 28-32 year old who just uses them for consistent sex and lures them along with spending money on them occasionally whilst going through his divorce and or who's just simply cheating. The average under 25 guy then just assumes that's the way of things and accepts that if he wants a relationship he has to go for younger women, many times ones who are more reality-based, and this usually means working-class women under 25 (teacher/waiter/secretary/+++).
Well,for one thing I have never found a women who loves making money more then having children very attractive!While I respect her for her work ethic and her abilities to compete in the workforce,in my mind she is nothing more then an evolutionary dead end!
Don't get me wrong,there is nothing wrong with women working today.Take
it from me,it almost always takes two incomes to survive in America today and my ex and I both had to work.It was tough but most human beings can adapt to any situation!
Older men "dipping" down to secure a younger women is nothing new in history.It used to be pretty commonplace for older men to marry younger brides simply because of security.The one thing I have learned from womenI am seeing this firsthand. A lot of established 25-30 something men are dipping down into the early twenties scene in order to find a wife because they want a family and the women in the corporate workforce who are 25-30 won't marry them and have kids. If those men are going for younger women who will give them kids and marry them then what's left for those women their age? Nothing. I think it is a tragedy. For let's be honest corporate/working women don't generally go for younger men, especially if they aren't established in their careers yet, which for these older women is a must.
is most of them who are family oriented value security more than anything
else in a marriage.
Also,when I was 19,I dated and lived with a 34 year old woman for a period of almost two years.She was a manager for a local company and had no problem dating me what so ever.
haha yeah that doesn't happen every day pal!Well,for one thing I have never found a women who loves making money more then having children very attractive!While I respect her for her work ethic and her abilities to compete in the workforce,in my mind she is nothing more then an evolutionary dead end!
Don't get me wrong,there is nothing wrong with women working today.Take
it from me,it almost always takes two incomes to survive in America today and my ex and I both had to work.It was tough but most human beings can adapt to any situation!
Older men "dipping" down to secure a younger women is nothing new in history.It used to be pretty commonplace for older men to marry younger brides simply because of security.The one thing I have learned from women
is most of them who are family oriented value security more than anything
else in a marriage.
Also,when I was 19,I dated and lived with a 34 year old woman for a period of almost two years.She was a manager for a local company and had no problem dating me what so ever.
Yeah, but now the media is trying to stigmatize this, painting such pairings as being somehow perverse.Older men "dipping" down to secure a younger women is nothing new in history.It used to be pretty commonplace for older men to marry younger brides simply because of security.The one thing I have learned from women
is most of them who are family oriented value security more than anything
else in a marriage.
If you notice, increasingly the media is also centering movies and shows around older women "finding themselves"(and love). Eat, Pray, Love.. the Big C(where Laura Linney has a nervous breakdown and acts like a teenager), etc. etc. Is this new trend a coincidence? I think not...
Yes lol they are amusing attempts to appeal to the superficial childless women. It is amusing but also so sad really.
in New York: many.
in Chechnya: Never.
Caucasus, North-->Vainakh-->Noxchi---->Noxchmaxkaxoi--->Ersenoi
Chechnya in Reality The Chechen Mentality Rock Music from North Caucasus About Vainakh Mythology The Chechen Language
Really? I thought Eastern Europe was the worst for women not marrying or having children...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
United States
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks