Reason for mass immigration

[Austin]

I have more of a problem with young men having kids. I think most Men in their early 20's aren't really fit to be fathers. Mentally or financially.


It is true that younger women are more fertile. But, I think very young women having kids isn't so good either.

Yes but Hus, a male's sperm is good till at least 45 on average...

The two aren't comparable. Feminism has ROBBED our Western women and made them supporters of their own consumerist, cultural Marxist nothingness demise.

Most guys get married around 25-35 these days to a younger woman usually. I know that I personally want to get married by 27. Males can do this biologically. We are the seeder organism. Women cannot do this biologically based on social realities.

If I'm a guy with a good job at 25-30, I don't want a woman over 25. I want my promised little virtuous 21-25 year old elementary teacher or paralegal, and I want her to work less and raise our kids. I DO NOT and WILL NOT accept a workaholic 25+ year old woman who is going to fight me on the above. I want a woman who wants that and cherishes it as do most men. Not some feminized, ruined anti-children corporate type who might have children with me according to her.....

[Husaria]

Yes but Hus, a male's sperm is good till at least 45 on average...

The two aren't comparable. Feminism has ROBBED our Western women and made them supporters of their own consumerist, cultural Marxist nothingness demise.

Most guys get married around 25-35 these days to a younger woman usually. I know that I personally want to get married by 27. Males can do this biologically. We are the seeder organism. Women cannot do this biologically based on social realities.

If I'm a guy with a good job at 25-30, I don't want a woman over 25. I want my promised little virtuous 21-25 year old elementary teacher or paralegal, and I want her to work less and raise my kids. I DO NOT and WILL NOT accept a workaholic 25+ year old woman who is going to fight me on the above. I want a woman who wants that and cherishes it as do most men. Not some feminized, ruined anti-children corporate type who might have children with me according to her.....

True, Feminism is a disease. The ironic part is Feminism has probably hurt Women more than anyone.
Well exept maybe kids.

But, Because of Feminism now Women are juggling careers & still expected to be mothers & then often end up divorced in the stress it creates.

This only harms women.

Feminism is blind.

We are created as men & women for a reason. Women are suppose to be more submissive & that makes us work together.
Having women who want to be men just creates problems.

The end result is our failing society with gangs, divorce, drugs ect which all largely stem to Feminism.

[BeerBaron]

True, Feminism is a disease. The ironic part is Feminism has probably hurt Women more than anyone.
Well exept maybe kids.

But, Because of Feminism now Women are juggling careers & still expected to be mothers & then often end up divorced in the stress it creates.

This only harms women.

Feminism is blind.

We are created as men & women for a reason. Women are suppose to be more submissive & that makes us work together.
Having women who want to be men just creates problems.

The end result is our failing society with gangs, divorce, drugs ect which all largely stem to Feminism.

Ya, it hurts men just as much. Look at wage trends in working class families over the past 50 or 60 years. Feminism doubled the labor force, so naturally the wages have been halved in the working class.

I don't suppose it would surprise anyone to find out that the Rockefeller Foundation was a major contributor to the feminist movement would it?

[SexComandante]

other

[Husaria]

Ya, it hurts men just as much. Look at wage trends in working class families over the past 50 or 60 years. Feminism doubled the labor force, so naturally the wages have been halved in the working class.

I don't suppose it would surprise anyone to find out that the Rockefeller Foundation was a major contributor to the feminist movement would it?

Yeah, It is almost needed to have a 2 income household now. You are right that when women started women they could charge more & thus today 2 incomes are needed.
Well, Unless you are quite wealthy.

Yeah, Rockerfeller is scum it wouldn't surprise me at all.

[BeerBaron]

Yeah, It is almost needed to have a 2 income household now. You are right that when women started women they could charge more & thus today 2 incomes are needed.
Well, Unless you are quite wealthy.

Yeah, Rockerfeller is scum it wouldn't surprise me at all.

It is a necessity in North America, unless one wage earner makes at least 80k (considered a high income job) a year, then they could care for a single child, though that's not a lot even for a 3 person family. Most families in my city earn an average income of 120-130k, well the white families do the indians are almost all on welfare.

Rockefeller was a huge contributor to the movement, they were also an equal rights contributor as well, we can draw whatever conclusions we want from that now but I have a heard time seeing it as a thought out plan.

[Sahson]

Right so you blame the factory workers that are being laid off because they want minimum wage for a job and not having to pay a lot of money for their groceries for the immigrants that take over their jobs ? Is that correct ?

The Law of Demand and the Law of supply is to blame, you can't go against these two laws, and it's how everything in Economics functions.

[YOUTUBE]tXt_3H3e2bg[/YOUTUBE]

[Laudanum]

It's ZOG.

I bet people on Stormfront would love this poll.

[Austin]

It's ZOG.

I bet people on Stormfront would love this poll.

Oh noes!!!!! We've been called evil racist antisemitic by some random poster who contributed NOTHING else in the post..... what a surprise.

Even though we stated it isn't a Jewish anything.....





On a side note, it's great to know that white feminists have their sons future incomes in mind that will one day take care of them.

Noo....... White feminism isn't an anti-white movement...... Austin stop being anti-women!!!!

[SwordoftheVistula]

It's mainly leftist ideologues, usually led & supported by jews with a phobia of white christian societies.

A general apathy amongst the native population is also responsible, you see a lot of stupid white people who just like having ethnic restaurants, and take tourism trips to ethnic restaurants in 'ethnic neighborhoods' during daylight in cities with good police forces. Most people don't take notice until their own town/neighborhood is overrun, and sometimes not even then.

Big corporations are mainly responsible for pressing for legal worker visas from Asia, also a lot of smaller businesses, mainly in farming & construction, use cheap labor from latin America.

Usually, the worst immigrants are the ones that are brought purely by leftists & anti-white people: not much of a profit can be made from criminals, illiterate refugees, and single mothers on welfare.

Yeah, It is almost needed to have a 2 income household now. You are right that when women started women they could charge more & thus today 2 incomes are needed.
Well, Unless you are quite wealthy.

It is a necessity in North America, unless one wage earner makes at least 80k (considered a high income job) a year, then they could care for a single child, though that's not a lot even for a 3 person family. Most families in my city earn an average income of 120-130k, well the white families do the indians are almost all on welfare.

It depends on where you live. The main cost of children/family is living in a decent neighborhood which is safe and has good schools, or for private schools. I don't know about Canada, but if you live in one of the major coastal metro areas, you need a high income in order to live in such a place.

On the other hand, if you live in a rural part of the country, the cost of having children is not much at all.