





blah


I see Wale, Pole and Mongole.

Nope
As for non-European admixture in Southern Europe, Eastern Europe and Northern Europe, I did not mean non-Caucasian admixture with concentration that has visible and obvious results.
What I meant is, minor non-European genetic influence, that has no visible or obvious results.
For example, a lot of Finnish and Estonian males belong to the Y-DNA Haplogroup N, which is also present in Yakuts and Mongolians.
Yet, both Finns and Estonians look nearly completely white, with Eurasiatic-looking individuals being a tiny minority.
This pretty much shows how little do haplogroups mean.



It seems everyone is sensitive about admixtures
Guys, do you realize that when it comes race and phenotypes, it's not what's inside (genes, genetical haplogroups) that matters, but in fact what's on the outside?
Genetics might say this and this person is 0.05% negroid or 5% mongoloid... but as long as that person looks like a White European, he IS White, and therefore Cauasian.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks