Macedonian or Bulgarian?

[JohnnyP]

Xaxaxaxaxaxa
Congrats, you won the game

With this you are laughting on G.Pulevski not on me, i think you need to search little bit to see who he was.

Edit : Stop masturbating on Macedonian posts, you have too much complexes towards Macedonians and Macedonia.
I know TRIBES is unknown area for you , you are Kievan Rus.

[Epirus DNA]

With this you are laughting on G.Pulevski not on me, i think you need to search little bit to see who he was.

Edit : Stop masturbating on Macedonian posts, you have too much complexes towards Macedonians and Macedonia.
I know TRIBES is unknown area for you , you are Kievan Rus.

Pulevski was a Bulgarian that combined the "old Bulgarian culture and history" with the Roman geographical location of the province of Macedonia in order to create a new nation.

In 1892, Pulevski completed the first Slavjanomakedonska opšta istorija (General History of the Macedonian Slavs), a large manuscript with over 1700 pages. In his last work: “Jazitshnica, soderzsayushtaja starobolgarski ezik, uredena em izpravlena da se uchat bolgarski i makedonski sinove i kerki"; ('Grammar, containing Old Bulgarian language, arranged and corrected to be taught to Bulgarian and Macedonian sons and daughters'), he considered the Macedonian dialects to be old Bulgarian and the differences between the two purely geographical.

Pulevski viewed Macedonian identity as being a regional phenomenon, similar to Herzegovinians and Thracians. He also sometimes described himself as a "Serbian patriot", but he also viewed his ethnic designation as "Bulgarian from the village of Galičnik".

[Vojnik]

Pulevski was a Bulgarian that combined the "old Bulgarian culture and history" with the Roman geographical location of the province of Macedonia in order to create a new nation.

In 1892, Pulevski completed the first Slavjanomakedonska opšta istorija (General History of the Macedonian Slavs), a large manuscript with over 1700 pages. In his last work: “Jazitshnica, soderzsayushtaja starobolgarski ezik, uredena em izpravlena da se uchat bolgarski i makedonski sinove i kerki"; ('Grammar, containing Old Bulgarian language, arranged and corrected to be taught to Bulgarian and Macedonian sons and daughters'), he considered the Macedonian dialects to be old Bulgarian and the differences between the two purely geographical.

Pulevski viewed Macedonian identity as being a regional phenomenon, similar to Herzegovinians and Thracians. He also sometimes described himself as a "Serbian patriot", but he also viewed his ethnic designation as "Bulgarian from the village of Galičnik".

So who 'created' the Macedonian ethnicity, Tito or Pulevski you bloody idiot.

Make up your damn minds.

[Turkophagos]

Question to northomkdnians: How do you feel about this guy:





?

[Epirus DNA]

So who 'created' the Macedonian ethnicity, Tito or Pulevski you bloody idiot.

Make up your damn minds.

Honest question... did you go to University?

Pulevski was a writer.
Tito was a dictator.

1 + 1 = 2

[Vojnik]

Question to northomkdnians: How do you feel about this guy:





?

Turko Phag.

In chapter five, Stephenson explores how the contemporary authors referred to Basil. An extensive survey of the Byzantine sources reveal that instead of Voulgaroktonos, Basil was generally referred to as porphyrogennetos or "born in the purple" to show he was the reigning emperor.Otherwise he was referred to as "the younger" or "the second". Thus Basil was known to the chroniclers and others as Basil II. This trend continued in the literature well beyond the life of Basil. Stephenson also reveals that this was well known even to biographers in the seventeenth century.

It is not until chapter six that the mystery is revealed in why Basil transforms from porphyrogennetos into the Voulgaroktonos. As one might suspect has more to do with political changes, particularly in the ways that Bulgars were viewed in the twelfth century, rather than any particular historical activities. However, Basil image would decline again in later centuries, particularly with the rise of the Turks and a decline in the threat from the Bulgars.

The nickname "Vulgaroktonous" is first mentioned in 14th century in the Ephraim Aenii Historia Chronica.

[JohnnyP]

Pulevski was a Bulgarian that combined the "old Bulgarian culture and history" with the Roman geographical location of the province of Macedonia in order to create a new nation.

In 1892, Pulevski completed the first Slavjanomakedonska opšta istorija (General History of the Macedonian Slavs), a large manuscript with over 1700 pages. In his last work: “Jazitshnica, soderzsayushtaja starobolgarski ezik, uredena em izpravlena da se uchat bolgarski i makedonski sinove i kerki"; ('Grammar, containing Old Bulgarian language, arranged and corrected to be taught to Bulgarian and Macedonian sons and daughters'), he considered the Macedonian dialects to be old Bulgarian and the differences between the two purely geographical.

Pulevski viewed Macedonian identity as being a regional phenomenon, similar to Herzegovinians and Thracians. He also sometimes described himself as a "Serbian patriot", but he also viewed his ethnic designation as "Bulgarian from the village of Galičnik".

Hahaha, you need to try it harder.

[Renekton]

Вечна Македонија, никогаш бугарска

[Vojnik]

Honest question... did you go to University?

Pulevski was a writer.
Tito was a dictator.

1 + 1 = 2

Who created the ethnicity?

[Epirus DNA]

Hahaha, you need to try it harder.

Pulevski was a confused Bulgarian, living in a war torn land between Serbs, Albanians, Greeks, Bulgarians, and Turks. It is clear as day in his writings.

In an application for a veteran pension to the Bulgarian Parliament in 1882, Pulevski expressed his regret about the failure of this unification (of Bulgaria). From 1883 until his death in 1895, Pulevsk received a government pension in recognition of his service as a Bulgarian!

Watch the YouTube video over and over and over again. Let it sink in. You're living in an echo chamber of lies and bullshit.