0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,269 Given: 13,631 |
I guess as expected.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,623 Given: 21,626 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,983 Given: 2,435 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 25,623 Given: 21,626 |
In Roman settlements usually are Roman, local people and mixed people burials, as well as auxiliar troops and people from all the corners of the Roman empire and foreigners, as merchants or slaves, in places like this I don't think it's easy to find representative proportions of the genetics of the area at that time, at least not entirely representative.
Editrobably seeing the mtdna could unveil more things tan Ydna in these type of archeological sites.
re-edit:and autosomal too.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
Yeah let's hope they will also publish Iron Age (Pre-Roman) samples.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 52,721 Given: 43,621 |
The Es are most likely Romanized Moesians. This site was located in Moesia, which is Thracian land.
Matches that Bulgarian Thracian who was also some older E1b mutation.
Looks like E was major HG among Thracians, but lets wait for autosomal to get a clearer picture.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,269 Given: 13,631 |
When are we getting autosomal data?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 188 Given: 105 |
Quite suprising seeing Germanic I1. I always assumed I1 outside of Italy and few other regions was spread gradually not mostly with Germanic migrations (only partially) but that is likely wrong.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,924 Given: 18,997 |
There is also one R1b-U106 among Roman era samples.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks