0
or it's very low. But how ?
when it comes to the west african ancestry it's due to shared alleles that goes back to the time when iberomaurusians spread their genes southward :
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/423079v1.fullMoreover, our model predicts that West Africans (represented by Yoruba) had 12.5±1.1% ancestry from a Taforalt-related group rather than Taforalt having ancestry from an unknown Sub-Saharan African source11; this may have mediated the limited Neanderthal admixture present in West Africans23. An advantage of our model is that it allows for a local North African component in the ancestry of Taforalt, rather than deriving them exclusively from Levantine and Sub-Saharan sources.
strangely this "12.5±1.1%" is very similar to the amount of SSA coastal NAs score on gedmatch.
As for the east african component it's also due to shared alleles (same source of ancestry) :
https://journals.plos.org/plosgeneti...l.pgen.1004393A single prehistoric migration of both the Maghrebi and the Ethio-Somali back into Africa is the most parsimonious hypothesis. That is, a common ancestral population migrated into northeast Africa through the Sinai and then split into two, with one branch continuing west across North Africa and the other heading south into the HOA
Also the capsian culture (originally from the Near East) that is found in both the maghreb and North-east africa (eburran culture). It can't be a coincidence :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsian_culture
What do you think ?
Bookmarks