0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,506 Given: 1,507 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,065 Given: 3,120 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,065 Given: 3,120 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 207 Given: 217 |
Yes, in my opinion.
Browning will occur.
That's life, though. Nothing can really be done about it. Native Europe is clearly 'tired', and however uncivilized and low IQ the immigrants may be, they have the 'virality' of the barbarian, the conqueror.
In 100 years many things will change
Thumbs Up |
Received: 8 Given: 26 |
Allowing millions of people into the continent would've seemed unrealistic 50 years ago. Immigrants are not a very influential class, not represented much in Military/Police/Politics as you seem to think. Mass repatriation is a matter of European political willpower. In Sweden for example you could deport 500 000 people in 3 months (or a million in half a year) with the largely redundant SAS fleet alone.
I think the real change will occur with increased AI and automation. Currently Europe does require millions in cheap labour, which is why politicians justified economic migration however as AI and automation continue to grow and takes millions of jobs away, the economic importance of the immigrant population will disappear. As soon the capitalists and industrialists no longer need immigrants, the political finance of pro-immigration will end. We're going to be dealing with lots of unemployment which will also pressure politicians.
England at least is going to continue down the current path of demographic change. It's not even particularly because of mixing, but a result of continuous immigration and low native fertility rates. White British (both men and women) are career oriented and hold out until as late as their 30s before starting families, and when they do it's only one or two children. Ethnics and immigrants start families or get knocked up in their early 20's or late teens and have far more kids on average
This is the British fertility rate, not even at replacement level. Mind you this is including immigrant groups/nonwhites living here, 1/3 of babies born in the UK were not white British in 2014. The white British fertility rate will be even lower than this.
And compared to the fertility rate of popular countries of origin for non-EU immigrants
Last edited by El_Abominacion; 10-10-2020 at 12:06 AM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,343 Given: 3,478 |
"Allobroges vaillants ! Dans vos vertes campagnes,
Accordez-moi toujours asile et sûreté,
Car j'aime à respirer l'air pur de vos montagnes,
Je suis la Liberté ! la Liberté !"
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,065 Given: 3,120 |
yes because it would imply the cooperation of all the european countries and don't forget that the great majority of these "foreigners" don't have any type of goods/property in their ancestral countries so basically that's like kicking out someone from his house and making him a homeless person (many of them have children I really doubt they will accept it gently and I doubt the international community will let that happen we're no more in 1492 to act this way)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 15,592 Given: 8,909 |
Remigration doesn't have to happen overnight. The identitarians advocate for peaceful and gradual remigration/repatriation.
Before the Soviet Union collapsed there were millions of ethnic Russians in Central Asia and Transcaucasia. And what happened to them? Most of them have left since 1991.
Also over a million of Jews have left the former Soviet Union since then. 2.5 million ethnic Germans and their family members (I think that includes the former Eastern bloc, not just the USSR).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks