What do you like and don't like about Hungarians?

[abcd123]

Hungary was created by western powers/ catholics powers, not Romania. Romania wasnt created in 1918, anyway

False.Why are you lying?Does it make you sleep better at night?

Hungary was created by its own people,while the Romania of today was created artificially by western powers.The country is composed of different regions which had nothing to do with one another before,which were artificially joined together.

[Subcarpați]

False.Why are you lying?Does it make you sleep better at night?

Hungary was created by its own people,while the Romania of today was created artificially by western powers.The country is composed of different regions which had nothing to do with one another before,which were artificially joined together.

Read something about Școala Ardeleană, or read something about Dimitrie Cantemir, Mihai Viteazul and so on.
And for you, Romania wasnt able to became a country in 1859, because most of western powers were against it.
Of course you cant compare the middle ages history ( Hungary formation) and modern ages ( Romania formation) because, in modern ages you cant create countries just because you wanna...

"The aftermath of the Russian Empire's defeat in the Crimean War brought the 1856 Treaty of Paris, which started a period of common tutelage for the Ottomans and a Congress of Great Powers—the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, the Second French Empire, the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia, the Austrian Empire, Prussia, and, though never again fully, Russia. While the Moldavia-Wallachia unionist campaign, which had come to dominate political demands, was accepted with sympathy by the French, Russians, Prussians, and Sardinians, it was rejected by the Austrian Empire, and looked upon with suspicion by Great Britain and the Ottomans."

[abcd123]

Read something about Școala Ardeleană, or read something about Dimitrie Cantemir, Mihai Viteazul and so on.
And for you, Romania wasnt able to became a country in 1859, because most of western powers were against it.
Of course you cant compare the middle ages history ( Hungary formation) and modern ages ( Romania formation) because, in modern ages you cant create countries just because you wanna...

"The aftermath of the Russian Empire's defeat in the Crimean War brought the 1856 Treaty of Paris, which started a period of common tutelage for the Ottomans and a Congress of Great Powers—the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, the Second French Empire, the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia, the Austrian Empire, Prussia, and, though never again fully, Russia. While the Moldavia-Wallachia unionist campaign, which had come to dominate political demands, was accepted with sympathy by the French, Russians, Prussians, and Sardinians, it was rejected by the Austrian Empire, and looked upon with suspicion by Great Britain and the Ottomans."

Well you called Hungary artificial,which is untrue.They formed a country naturally,with the same ethnicity and culture throughout the country.This can't be said about Romania.The three main regions were somewhat different from one another,and Transylvania was totally different,an almost different world ethnically culturally and religiously,so if anything the joining of these not-so-homogenous regions is artificial.The joining of Transylvania with Romania was something the western powers wanted,especially the french.Transylvania wasn't even conquered because it was ethnically and culturally romanian.This is artificial in my book.

[blogen]

Than explain me how hungarians became a christian and non nomandic country.

Nomadic? Our ancestors were nomads in the early iron age only! For example the Hungarian conqueror's agriculture were developed, than the local Slav, because the Iranian Chorezmian elements between the Magyars, this is the reason, why only the local plant's and food's name are Slavic loanwords in the Hungarian language, while the whole agricultural terminology is Iranian and Turkic tradition. Or the social structure of our 10th century society was feudal as the German and Slavic structure. Etc.

The very little difference between the barbarian Germans, Slavs and Magyars were the reason, why we chosed the Catholic tradition and not the highly developed Byzantine or the islam of the Caliphate. They were the too different peoples, because there were the huge distance between the barbarian Europe and the highly developed byzantine and islam world. And an other hand, they were fags on the meaning of the contemporary liberal world. Defenseless and weak peoples of their decadent world and this was the main reason, why they were not sample for the barbarians as the Germans or the Magyars. We clearly understand each other with the Germans and the Slavs in the 10th century and we were fitting into their very primitive European world easily because of this.

And this is the reason, why the transition from the 10th century pagan feudalism to the 11th century christian feudalism was an organic development, without any break or significant change in our society and culture.

This is what you don't know, because your historiography have a totaly false myth about the Magyars and of course about the Romanians to, but that is your problem.

[Subcarpați]

Well you called Hungary artificial,which is untrue.They formed a country naturally,with the same ethnicity and culture throughout the country.This can't be said about Romania.The three main regions were somewhat different from one another,and Transylvania was totally different,an almost different world ethnically culturally and religiously,so if anything the joining of these not-so-homogenous regions is artificial.The joining of Transylvania with Romania was something the western powers wanted,especially the french.Transylvania wasn't even conquered because it was ethnically and culturally romanian.This is artificial in my book.

Lol, where you learned this history?
Again, search about Școala Ardeleană.
Transylvania was occupied before Trianon , Hungary too
All romanians are orthodox dude, biggest Transylvania ethnicity was romanian. Most areas were inhabited by romanians, hungarians and germans lived in cities. So wtf?
And Wallachia and Moldova were created after the pression of hungarians on romanians from Transylvania. Read about Bogdan Mușat and Negru Vodă.
The westren powers wanted because that was the reason of Romania to enter in WW1, this was our main requirment to fight against germans.

[Subcarpați]

This is what you don't know, because your historiography have a totaly false myth about the Magyars and of course about the Romanians to, but that is your problem.

This is what I dont like at hungarians. ( I know you are not a hungarian, you are just a asian guy), the frustration to make slovakians,serbs,and romanians to look shitty, just because we got what was ours.
Why you cant accept that both of us have stupid historians, and why you cant be objective ? The objectivism at hungarians is 0, in your eyes you are the best nation, a nation betrayed and bullshit like this. Is not our problems because you cant accept the disparition of an empire. But fucking do something with your frustration and propaganda against other nations, you are pathetic, we are in 21 century.

[Stears]

There's are more old countries, you braindead. Bulgaria,Serbia,Sweden

Independent Serbia appeared in the 13th century. And it existed as an independent state only for a century. Bulgarian state became part of ottoman empire in the 15th century, so there are no continuity

[Stears]

Lol, where you learned this history?
Again, search about Școala Ardeleană.
Transylvania was occupied before Trianon , Hungary too
All romanians are orthodox dude, biggest Transylvania ethnicity was romanian. Most areas were inhabited by romanians, hungarians and germans lived in cities. So wtf?
And Wallachia and Moldova were created after the pression of hungarians on romanians from Transylvania. Read about Bogdan Mușat and Negru Vodă.
The westren powers wanted because that was the reason of Romania to enter in WW1, this was our main requirment to fight against germans.

Romania was the weakest country in WW1. Romanian was the shortest lasting frontline in WW1.

On 27 August 1916, Romania proclaimed war against Austria-Hungary. The Romanian army crossed the borders of Eastern Hungary (Transylvania). By November 1916, the Central Powers had defeated the Romanian army and occupied the southern and eastern parts of Romania. On 6 December the Central Powers captured Bucharest, the Romanian capital city.^[138]

[Stears]

This is what I dont like at hungarians. ( I know you are not a hungarian, you are just a asian guy), the frustration to make slovakians,serbs,and romanians to look shitty, just because we got what was ours.
Why you cant accept that both of us have stupid historians, and why you cant be objective ? The objectivism at hungarians is 0, in your eyes you are the best nation, a nation betrayed and bullshit like this. Is not our problems because you cant accept the disparition of an empire. But fucking do something with your frustration and propaganda against other nations, you are pathetic, we are in 21 century.

What was yours? You were late nomadic immigrants from the 13th century.

[Antimage]

You are a Gypsy, like this guys:

Why was this necessary?