Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 62

Thread: Balkanic genetic study

  1. #41
    account terminated.
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Last Online
    09-18-2023 @ 03:11 PM
    Ethnicity
    N/A
    Country
    Abkhazia
    Gender
    Posts
    48,373
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 52,721
    Given: 43,621

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vbnetkhio View Post
    These are probably the Croats from Split from the Reich lab dataset, i think i posted their k13 long ago.
    I thought so too, but than again these academic samples from Split aren't that southern but pretty usual Croats with only few outliers from what I remember. They weren't south of Romanians for sure.

  2. #42
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Last Online
    04-13-2024 @ 09:22 AM
    Ethnicity
    Healthy human being
    Country
    Moldova
    Gender
    Posts
    5,581
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5,506
    Given: 1,507

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CommonSense View Post
    So much for Davidski's leak that the Slavic invaders were like modern-day Serbs Unless he thought that the 10th century is no different from Late Antiquity, lmao.
    Why? The problem here is that the number of Serb samples is significantly higher than that of the Kuline samples. If you'd have as many Kuline samples as Serb, then all that space within the Kuline cluster will be populated. The differences would be minimal.

  3. #43
    Veteran Member CommonSense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Last Online
    02-24-2024 @ 11:53 PM
    Location
    Belgrade
    Meta-Ethnicity
    South Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Serbian
    Ancestry
    81.25% Serbian, 12.5% Croatian, 6.25% Romanian
    Country
    Serbia
    Y-DNA
    G-Y225016
    mtDNA
    H12a*
    Taxonomy
    Pontid + Alpine/Gorid
    Religion
    Agnosticism
    Age
    27
    Gender
    Posts
    9,565
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,863
    Given: 8,987

    2 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ion Basescul View Post
    Why? The problem here is that the number of Serb samples is significantly higher than that of the Kuline samples. If you'd have as many Kuline samples as Serb, then all that space within the Kuline cluster will be populated. The differences would be minimal.
    No, the problem here is that he erroneously characterised them as 'Slavic invader samples' and equated them with the Slavs who settled Greece, drawing a conclusion that the Slavic admix in Greece is much higher than we thought it was. When in reality those individuals from Kuline lived four fucking centuries after Slavs had settled the Balkans all the way down to the Aegean.

  4. #44
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Last Online
    03-11-2024 @ 04:25 PM
    Ethnicity
    Unknown
    Country
    Antarctica
    Gender
    Posts
    3,911
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,471
    Given: 1,541

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stearsolina View Post
    I thought so too, but than again these academic samples from Split aren't that southern but pretty usual Croats with only few outliers from what I remember. They weren't south of Romanians for sure.
    The pca is kind of weird, but their average point does land in between Serbs and Hungarians.

    I'm pretty sure it's those samples since it's the same lab, and in the study they don't mention seqencing any new Croatian samples

  5. #45
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Last Online
    03-11-2024 @ 04:25 PM
    Ethnicity
    Unknown
    Country
    Antarctica
    Gender
    Posts
    3,911
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,471
    Given: 1,541

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CommonSense View Post
    No, the problem here is that he erroneously characterised them as 'Slavic invader samples' and equated them with the Slavs who settled Greece, drawing a conclusion that the Slavic admix in Greece is much higher than we thought it was. When in reality those individuals from Kuline lived four fucking centuries after Slavs had settled the Balkans all the way down to the Aegean.
    I think there will also be another study which shows "Slavic invaders" in Macedonia being Serb-like, but the samples will also probably be from a later medieval era.

  6. #46
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Last Online
    04-13-2024 @ 09:22 AM
    Ethnicity
    Healthy human being
    Country
    Moldova
    Gender
    Posts
    5,581
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5,506
    Given: 1,507

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CommonSense View Post
    No, the problem here is that he erroneously characterised them as 'Slavic invader samples' and equated them with the Slavs who settled Greece, drawing a conclusion that the Slavic admix in Greece is much higher than we thought it was. When in reality those individuals from Kuline lived four fucking centuries after Slavs had settled the Balkans all the way down to the Aegean.
    I see, is this the same paper as the one he referred to?

  7. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Last Online
    02-15-2024 @ 09:36 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    castizo
    Ethnicity
    Hispánico
    Country
    Argentina
    Gender
    Posts
    304
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 124
    Given: 320

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    good.

  8. #48
    Veteran Member Tschaikisten's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Last Online
    09-10-2022 @ 09:49 PM
    Ethnicity
    Србин
    Ancestry
    Dinarische Alpen, Pannonien
    Country
    Serbia
    Region
    Herzegovina
    Y-DNA
    G-L497
    Gender
    Posts
    1,238
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,469
    Given: 941

    3 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ion Basescul View Post
    Supplementary Table 2. Information about newly reported present-day Serbs genotyped with the Human Origins array
    These people were tested firstly for Y-DNA in cooperation of Biological faculty in Belgrade and Serbian DNA Project, like many others (more than 1000). That cooperation exist for years. Concretely samples of these people were used for this study and deeper analysis.
    Using 2 populations approximation:
    1 50% Croatian +50% Serbian @ 2.265001

    Quote Originally Posted by The Destroyer
    how come the age of I2a2 Din subclade exactly coincides with the age of Bosnian Pyramids?

  9. #49
    Veteran Member CommonSense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Last Online
    02-24-2024 @ 11:53 PM
    Location
    Belgrade
    Meta-Ethnicity
    South Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Serbian
    Ancestry
    81.25% Serbian, 12.5% Croatian, 6.25% Romanian
    Country
    Serbia
    Y-DNA
    G-Y225016
    mtDNA
    H12a*
    Taxonomy
    Pontid + Alpine/Gorid
    Religion
    Agnosticism
    Age
    27
    Gender
    Posts
    9,565
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,863
    Given: 8,987

    1 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ion Basescul View Post
    I see, is this the same paper as the one he referred to?
    No, apparently vbn is right and he was talking about some samples from North Macedonia:



    Anyway, as attested by multiple historical sources, Slavs settled in Greece pretty much at the same time as they did in, for example, Dalmatia. He made a bunch of sensationalist claims because he dislikes Greeks, as evidenced by these two blog posts ( a and b) and would like nothing more than to prove how modern-day Greeks have nothing to do whatsoever with those from antiquity.

    So, as we can see, way back in 2017 he tried to push the mentioned thesis as true, so it's natural he sees confirmation bias everywhere. The only thing I can conlude, apart from him having some weird obssesions, is that his knowledge of the history of this region is negligible.
    Last edited by CommonSense; 09-01-2021 at 04:08 PM.

  10. #50
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Last Online
    03-11-2024 @ 04:25 PM
    Ethnicity
    Unknown
    Country
    Antarctica
    Gender
    Posts
    3,911
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,471
    Given: 1,541

    0 Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tschaikisten View Post
    These people were tested firstly for Y-DNA in cooperation of Biological faculty in Belgrade and Serbian DNA Project, like many others (more than 1000). That cooperation exist for years. Concretely samples of these people were used for this study and deeper analysis.
    They sequenced 1000 modern Serbs?

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Khazars. A new genetic study
    By PAGANE in forum DNA Scientific Papers
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 01-04-2021, 06:31 AM
  2. Canarian Genetic Study
    By Isleño in forum Autosomal DNA
    Replies: 270
    Last Post: 04-14-2020, 01:20 PM
  3. Romanian Genetic Study
    By Daco Celtic in forum România
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-08-2019, 08:51 PM
  4. USA big genetic study 15.620 samples
    By Argentano in forum United States
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-20-2019, 02:31 PM
  5. The Genetic study of Peloponnese is a pseudoscientific study.
    By Laberia in forum DNA Scientific Papers
    Replies: 210
    Last Post: 03-31-2019, 04:01 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •