There is no such thing as "White", only Cauasian with Light skin.
Yes, most of them are white.
No. You have to be White BOTH culturally and biologically. Judaism is incompatible with European culture.
No. They have Negroid and/or Mongoloid admixture.
No. They are Middle Eastern Semitic Arabs!
NO! NO! NEVER!
Are Jews white?
I don't really know where to post it.
I thought about posting to Anthropology or Politics & Ideology, but I couldn't decide, so I decided to put it here.
Most Jews belong to the Armenoid or Arabid race, right?
Both races are sub-races of the Caucasian race.
So, here are some pictures of Jews:
No,never. Even if some look white via admixture they still have a non-white culture and values.
Agreed.Originally Posted by Unurautare
"Middle Eastern Semitic Arabs!" is too harsh a wording. They are simply a mix between whites (Europeans, that is), West Asians and Middle Easterners. When the first component predominates to the point when a person with some historical Jewish ancestry becomes genetically poorly distinguishable from most Europeans, this person becomes white.
More or less pure Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews are not white. Look at that huge Middle Eastern and West Asian score:
Jews aren't race or nation! They are only nationalist religious sect! Most of them have european or khazarian origin!
White historically referred to people of European descent.
However, since Europeans colonized the Americas and Australia, the meaning of the word changes.
Instead of meaning people of European descent, "White" now means people who LOOK European. This also includes the non-Indoeuropean Finns, Hungarians, Estonians and Basques.
However, for many of us - including Civis Batavi, Hess, Unurautare, and me - being White is not just biological: it's also cultural.
For us, to be fully White, you have to be White both biologically and culturally. We consider Islam and Judaism to be incompatible with European culture, therefore we consider Jews, Turks, Albanians and Muslim Bosniaks non-white, no matter how European they look.
I am referring to 'Europeans' in the common sense of the word, not to Indo-Europeans. That, of course, includes European-Americans (and other colonials), Finns, et al. This is certainly a valid concept for physical anthropology and genetics:
I don't really think one should assign too much importance to linguistic groups - Hungarians, for instance, are genetically inbetween Romanians, Germans and neighbouring Slavs. Their myths of a Central Asian descent are irrelevant to the physical world. Moreover, no one really regards them as Central Asians.
You don't really have to consider Turks non-European because of culture, they are non-European physically, even less so than Ashkenazi Jews. But it seems absurd to me to say that Bosniaks are not European. Culture and religion seem too fickle - so a person can switch many times in their life between being European and non-European?
Still, Judaism is incompatible with European culture.I am referring to 'Europeans' in the common sense of the word, not to Indo-Europeans. That, of course, includes European-Americans (and other colonials), Finns, et al. This is certainly a valid concept for physical anthropology and genetics:
A white-looking Jew may be biologically white, but culturally not. That makes him/her only 50% white.
Half-white = NOT white
Hungarians are genetically a mix between Eastern Europeans and Western Europeans, with a little bit of Nordic and Mediterranean admixture in some Hungarians.
Allegedly Hungarian females "more Hungarian" than Hungarian males.
Some Romanian, Serbian and Slovakian propagandists and Nationalists do, and call us "Mongols".
Jew from China
Jew from Poland:
African Jew:
THEY ARE ONLY SECT!
If a European converts to Judaism or Islam, he ceases to be European.
As simple as that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
United States
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks