1
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,023 Given: 2,190 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,595 Given: 463 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,506 Given: 1,507 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,627 Given: 48,362 |
Because of their long-lasting isolation not only through hundreds of years but actually millennia. Also their Siberian admixture explains that.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,075 Given: 1,717 |
They aren't some sort of special, isolated population like others are saying. It's simply Mongoloid admixture, it's so diverged and far away from anything Caucasoid they'll be closer to populations with similar amounts of Mongoloid and very far from any Caucasoids. It's kinda like a Spaniard will be genetically closer to a North Italian than a Uruguayan who is 90% Spaniard but 5% Amerindian and 5% SSA.
If you took away the recent Mongoloid from both Finns and Russians, Finns as awhole(maybe not SW Finns) are still slightly closer to Russians anyway because Finns are 35% Germanic, 55% Baltic-like(rest recent East Asian), but they would be much closer to both populations in terms of distance.
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.oldschool anthropologydivided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpine
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks